Looks Like God Is Being Sued... XD
#1
Posted 18 September 2007 - 08:20 PM
http://www.foxnews.c...,297121,00.html
The Nebraskan State Senator decided to "sue God" in order to oppose possible laws that don't allow the filing of frivolous lawsuits. This is real, by the way, and I want to know what you guys think.
#2
Posted 18 September 2007 - 08:23 PM
#4
Posted 18 September 2007 - 09:20 PM
Quote
Chambers said senators periodically have offered bills prohibiting the filing of certain types of suits. He said his main objection is the constitution requires that the doors to the courthouse be open to all. Chambers said, "Thus anybody can file a lawsuit against anybody-- even God."
Triggering Chambers' action is a federal lawsuit against a state judge who barred the words "rape" and "victim" in court.
Chambers' lawsuit, which was filed on Friday in Douglas County Court, seeks a permanent injunction ordering God to cease certain harmful activities and the making of terroristic threats.
The lawsuit admits God goes by all sorts of aliases, names, titles and designations and it also recognizes the fact that the defendant is "Omnipresent."
Chambers wrote in the lawsuit that he's tried to contact God numerous times.
The lawsuit also accuses God “of making and continuing to make terroristic threats of grave harm," and alleges God has caused, "fearsome floods, egregious earthquakes, horrendous hurricanes, terrifying tornadoes, pestilential plagues, ferocious famines, devastating droughts, genocidal wars, birth defects, and the like."
Chambers asks for the court to grant him a summary judgment. He said as an alternative, he wants the judge to set a date for a hearing as "expeditiously" as possible and enter a permanent injunction enjoining God from engaging in the types of deleterious actions and the making of terroristic threats described in the lawsuit.
#5
Posted 18 September 2007 - 09:24 PM
What exactly does this guy hope to gain, besides the hatred of thousands of Christian fanatisits?!
#7
Posted 18 September 2007 - 09:33 PM
#8
Posted 18 September 2007 - 09:35 PM
#14
Posted 18 September 2007 - 10:52 PM
#16
Posted 18 September 2007 - 10:55 PM
DarkSword, on Sep 19 2007, 02:52 PM, said:
But there's no proof that he doesn't exist. And the judicial system cannot discriminate against those who follow a concordant religion.
#19
Posted 18 September 2007 - 11:30 PM
#21
Posted 19 September 2007 - 10:05 AM
#22
Posted 19 September 2007 - 12:12 PM
Wind Dude, on Sep 19 2007, 05:47 AM, said:
No. I lmao'd when I read it. This really does prove the 'americans are dumb' stereotype correct.
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=PF0eIwkjlaU
I'm pressing charges against god for murder.
#23
Posted 19 September 2007 - 12:34 PM
#24
Posted 19 September 2007 - 03:52 PM
Nickelback, on Sep 18 2007, 11:58 PM, said:
What a dumbass...
WD is quoted becuase that's pretty much what the movie was about.
I can't tell if you're agreeing with me or not.
But to the rest, he's just proving a point. Albeit it's a radical point, but it's a point nevertheless.
Though this post will probably just be ignored. :)
#25
Posted 20 September 2007 - 12:53 AM
Caael, on Sep 19 2007, 11:12 AM, said:
Like I said, he's doing this to make a point that too any people sue for the most absured reasons. He chose to sue god instead of just saying his point because more people were likely to listen if he "sued god." And he was right. He's not doing it to be a dumbass, he's doing it to make a point.
#26
Posted 20 September 2007 - 12:59 AM
#27
Posted 20 September 2007 - 03:50 PM
#28
Posted 20 September 2007 - 04:09 PM
I think it's hilarious that people sue fast food and candy companies for making them fat. Wasn't a law made a couple years ago for the US so people can't do that? It's funny they even had to go to the trouble to make a law to stop it. It's times like that that I agree that Americans are dumbasses.
#29
Posted 20 September 2007 - 04:54 PM
A. They now have the power to do so.
B. They need the money more.
C. Everyone else is doing it.
I AM AWARE that the man was trying to make a point.
#32
Posted 22 September 2007 - 10:47 AM
#33
Posted 23 September 2007 - 01:25 PM
#34
Posted 28 September 2007 - 10:41 PM
#35
Posted 29 September 2007 - 06:09 AM
#36
Posted 30 September 2007 - 12:27 AM
That's why I love the EU, you hardly find judges upholding idiotic stuff like the above.
#38
Posted 30 September 2007 - 12:36 AM
#39
Posted 30 September 2007 - 03:47 AM
#40
Posted 30 September 2007 - 10:00 AM
#41
Posted 30 September 2007 - 11:41 AM
We could go on about this if you want, and never cite any articles. :P
#43
Posted 30 September 2007 - 03:19 PM
It's true!
#45
Posted 01 October 2007 - 01:48 PM
#46
Posted 01 October 2007 - 08:37 PM
#48
Posted 18 October 2007 - 07:26 PM
#49
Posted 18 January 2008 - 03:01 PM
.eugine, on Sep 30 2007, 01:27 AM, said:
That's why I love the EU, you hardly find judges upholding idiotic stuff like the above.
This story is even worse.
This women bought some meth, and OD'd and went into a coma. She wakes up 3 monthes later, sues the drug dealer, and WINS. She won, yet the thing she bought was ****ING ILLEGAL.
Shows how bad the judicial system is now adays.
EDIT-I'm SO sorry, I didn't notice how old this was. Sorry.
#50
Posted 18 January 2008 - 03:53 PM
There was a story about a woman buying coffee from Mcdonalds, putting it in her lap while hr son was driving the car, and the coffee spilling on her lap. The coffee burned her legs, she sued Mcdonalds, and won 3 million dollars. I hate annoying people like that who think everything is someone else's fault.
EDIT: Found it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liebeck_v._Mc...27s_Restaurants
#51
Posted 18 January 2008 - 04:51 PM
ihatekraden, on Jan 18 2008, 04:53 PM, said:
HEY.
1. NEVER, compare me to him again, or I will rip your balls off. :D.
2. I honestly didn't notice how old this was. I was reading through it, and forgot I was reading an old topic.
3. I said sorry.
4. Atleast I wasn't snooping around 2 year old topics, and bumping them becasue I didn't wanna duplicate it.
5. Have a nice day.