[Toasty]

I've seen the others, and they were epic. My favorite was the last crusade. :D

Anyway, there's FINALLY another one after 19 years. I'm definately going to see it.

Has anyone else seen it? Or are you going to?

[Drizzy Drake]

Is it even out yet?

[Folcon]

I don't think it has yet. Does Harrison Ford star in it?

[TheEnglishman]

Of course he does. No one should be able to touch that hat (thought I do remember MD having one of his one).
I've seen the trailer as well. It looks like Lucas hasn't gone all Stars Wars on us and make the whole thing look unrecognisable, it looks like a real Indiana Jones movie.

[Folcon]

I'm surprised ford agreed to do it. Isn't he getting kind of old for action movies? I sorta fell the same about Stalone doing another Rambo movie. He's just getting kinda old for it.

[TheEnglishman]

Yeah it's amazing how people can be swayed by something as trivial as money. :D

[Drizzy Drake]

Indiana 4
Die Hard 4
A new Rambo
A new Rocky


Looks like old movies are being brought back lately.

[TheEnglishman]

There seems to be an idea that bringing back old movies is a good idea. It wouldn't shock me if they announced a Ghostbusters 3.

[Folcon]

And I've heard, although its only hearsay, that a fourth Terminator movie is in development. They just have to wait till Arnold is done being governor.

[Sea of Time]

You know who's more exciting who's in this movie? Shia Leboeuf. I'm honestly super-pumped to go see this though.

[Drizzy Drake]

I thought Transformers was gonig to suck becasue Shia was in it(not that he's a bad actor, but he just doesn't seem like he would fit the role), but it was an alright movie.

I jsut think that Indiana 4, won't really be an Indiana movie. I mean, Die Hard 4 was good, but it wasn't really a Die Hard movie. You know what I mean.

Oh, offtopic but, Kevin Smith being in DH4 was pure awsomeness.

[Judgement]

I'm not so sure about the old Indy, but I probably will see it. I bet Shia is supposed to represent the new Indiana Jones. Indy will probably be training him like Obi-Wan or something. (Weird i said that, since i'm not really a Star Wars fan.)

[kate]

indiana jones movies are possibly the worst movies ever, and I don't see how they've managed to improve upon it now. What, add more cheesy one liners? Or found new tempos to play their theme song over and over again. I swear their sound track only has the one song, just played slowly for the dramatic moments and quickly for the heroic ones.

and oh GAWDS the so not funny funny bits.

so um yeah I'll probably see it XD

[Someone Else]

Me111, on Feb 27 2008, 09:43 AM, said:

Of course he does. No one should be able to touch that hat (thought I do remember MD having one of his one).

I have an Indiana Jones hat.

Looking forward to this movie.

[Toasty]

escout, on Feb 27 2008, 10:07 AM, said:

I'm surprised ford agreed to do it. Isn't he getting kind of old for action movies? I sorta fell the same about Stalone doing another Rambo movie. He's just getting kinda old for it.

When interviewed a few years ago, he was asked if he would ever agree to another Indiana Jones movie, and he said yes. I'm not surprised in the least, and if it was anyone but Harrison Ford, I'd boycott it.

Like Me111 said, no one deserves to touch that hat ecxcept for him.

And Shia Lebouef is LUCKY. It was only a few years ago that his only noteable role in anything was "Even Stevens", and that was as a quirky prankster. Now he's in an INDIANA JONES MOVIE. I would kill for that part. But if he becomes the next Indiana Jones, I'll crawl into a hole and die.

And Kevin Smith is an awesome actor.

And Kate, dubbed mainstream anime is worse. BELIEVE me. The "Not so funny, funny parts" are too frequent. They make me want to hurl.

[Drizzy Drake]

I know Kevin Smith si a great actor, but just seeing him in their made that movie for me. His movies are funny as hell, and Mallrats is in my top 3 movies.

[Toasty]

I didn't noticce this until today (hense me asking if anyone had seen it yet), but the movie comes out in May where I live. It think it was the 22nd.

[redchi]

i never thought it would come out i love those moives

[TheEnglishman]

I just looked at the Wiki page for the movie, and apparently there's a character in it called 'Mutt Williams'. I can't believe how close my name got to being in an Indiana Jones movie. :P

[Drizzy Drake]

Matt Williams?

I know a kid named Matt Williams.

My name is SO close to being in the first Ghost Recon. Theres is a Chris Hunt, but NOOO they couldn't put a "er" at the end/

[TheEnglishman]

Oh dear.
I'm not going to worry too much, as it's the first review I've seen. Even so, it sounds worrying that the movie may have picked up the CG disease that the Star Wars prequels had.

[Mallick]

Holy bitch, I've had the Indiana Jones theme stuck in my head for ages after seeing a fuckin' M&M's commercial that had it. ._.

[Toasty]

Me111, on May 18 2008, 02:41 PM, said:

Oh dear.
I'm not going to worry too much, as it's the first review I've seen. Even so, it sounds worrying that the movie may have picked up the CG disease that the Star Wars prequels had.

What is this "CG Disease" you speak of? I know no such thing.

[TheEnglishman]

Overloading on computer graphics rather than doing it themselves. The newer Star Wars films suffered from it, and James Bond suffered from it before Casino Royale.

[Mallick]

@Split CG disease at it's worst.

[Toasty]

Me111, on May 18 2008, 10:57 PM, said:

Overloading on computer graphics rather than doing it themselves. The newer Star Wars films suffered from it, and James Bond suffered from it before Casino Royale.

Well when it comes to Starwars, it'd be kind of hard to even do just lightsaber fights without CG (excluding the sabers). The fights in IV,V, and VI were pretty....bland in comparison. Besides, CG is a lot cheaper. Though I fail to see how Indiana Jones would find it hard to get funding.

I just hope they don't make scenes like the ones in the Temple of Doom where the water comes gushing out of the mines, in CG. If they did it before without computers, they can do it again. It didn't look half bad either.

[Ironsight]

I saw the movie today. I wouldn't say it was bad...It just didn't quite live up to the older ones. The Quest for the Holy Grail is still my favorite.

[Fury]

I saw it last week. It wasn't quite as good as previous installments, but its still a good movie.

[Laharl]

this film was atrocious, an insult to the original trilogy.

[Caael]

It was alright but oh my god some of the parts were just so engineered, like the lead linedx fridge.

And what the FUCK is up with the monkeys? That part was the most superfluous and un-needed scene i've ever seen in a film.

[Platinum Sun]

I think it failed because there was no Sean Connery in it. I mean really, the answer to 'Did it have Sean Connery in it?' and 'Was it a good movie?' Are always the same answer. Sean Connery is what Chuck Norris would be if he were old. That is, if Chuck Norris were not immortal and could age.

[Toasty]

They tried too hard, just like with the Temple of Doom. Too much CG.

Th Raiders of the Lost Arc and The Last Crusade were both quests for Christian based items. They were also both the best. Coincidence? I think not. -_-

[Laharl]

Except temple of doom was good.......and had no CG >>

[Kikuichimonji]

I don't get why people hate the Temple of Doom. It had Short Round for heavens sake!

I watched it a couple of days after it came out. I was going to write a long version of this post but I can't be bothered and I doubt any of you'd bother reading it if it were long.

It was fun movie. It really was. I enjoyed watching it and I think alot of people forget that when you first watched the other three movies you were about 6 or something (well I was). I thoroughly loved the action sequences personally, even if some of them broke a bazillion physics laws (fridge escape anyone?)

One thing I would've wished they'd have done is stick with the old Mayan/Aztec mythology, rather than bringing in aliens. That was hard to digest personally.

[TheEnglishman]

Kikuichimonji, on Jun 10 2008, 11:21 PM, said:

I don't get why people hate the Temple of Doom. It had Short Round for heavens sake!

That's my reason. I hated that kid. Plus, there was no Nazis.

[Ironsight]

Temple of Doom was the worst out of the series before the Crystal Skull. The only CG I can recall is the part where the woman is getting lowered into the fire pit.

[Caael]

The worst part of temple of doom for me was the banquet scene, with the snake that was cut open, and then the little snakes came out and people ate them. And the monkey brains. Put me off eating anything for about a week.

[Fury]

I thought it was good. Thought not as good as the others. Somehow, aliens don't quite fit that type of movie.

[Ironsight]

Yeah. As soon as they mentioned aliens my expectations for the movie began to fall rapidly.

[Caael]

Most of it was good; the scene in the warehouse at the beginning, finding the first skull. But the bit with the monkeys was just completely and totally unneccessary, completely contrived and just stupid. The aliens were unneeded; could have had something better but they didnt ruin it for me.

[Kikuichimonji]

Me111, on Jun 10 2008, 11:44 PM, said:

That's my reason. I hated that kid. Plus, there was no Nazis.

I don't get why it has to be the Nazis which are the big bad villains of the Indy movies. And you sir have no taste :( Not liking Short Round..*mutters*

Caael, on Jun 11 2008, 12:21 PM, said:

But the bit with the monkeys was just completely and totally unneccessary, completely contrived and just stupid.

Haha when I saw that i was just itching to do a Tarzan impression at that point. It would have been totally inappropriate in a cinema though -_-

[Blue]

It was good, but the ending ruined the entire thing for me. It was just like, "What the hell man?"

[Toasty]

Laharl, on Jun 6 2008, 01:41 AM, said:

Except temple of doom was good.......and had no CG >>

Alright, it was too over the top. I thought it was okay, but it wasn't as good as the other two.

[redchi]

i just saw it today i though it was great imo

[Caael]

Temple of Doom was the best one. It had Short Round, Mola Ram, the Maharaja etc

It was just the most awesome one.

Raiders was awesome too, because of the face melt scene and the boxer on the runway

Crusade was only made good because of Henry Jones and the boat chase in Venice. The bit with the nazi's and the zeppelin was awful.

[Ironsight]

TEMPLE OF DOOM WAS BAD AND YOU SHOULD FEEL BAD.

[Caael]

Everybody deserves an opinion.

Yours is just wrong.

[Drizzy Drake]

It was a fun movie, but horrible as an Indy one. Aliens, really?

[Ironsight]

Good Indy movies: Raiders of the Lost Ark, The Last Crusade
Bad Indy movies: Temple of Doom, Kingdom of the Crystal Skull
That's my list.

[Caael]

DS is wrong, Doom was the best in the series IMO. Apart from Willie and her patheticness, it was perfect.