Omg!
#1
Posted 09 September 2004 - 04:59 PM
I don't anyone from this forum was doing this... (except for one person that stopped)
#2
Posted 09 September 2004 - 07:22 PM
Later on, I came back for a little bit and he just said: "Came back to check on me eh? e.e"
[CENSORED] >.<!!!!
I'm not the only one with this problem @.@;; So, I'll just stick to my friends n.n; (Even though the stlakers still follow us -_-;; )
#3
Posted 09 September 2004 - 09:13 PM
#4
Posted 09 September 2004 - 09:22 PM
If that doesn't stop, PM your info to Max I guess. He can deal with them.
Keep in mind, it's just a server test and once the 1.0 version comes out with mods, that won't happen.
#5
Posted 10 September 2004 - 03:01 PM
#6
Posted 10 September 2004 - 08:13 PM
Yeesh...I get stalked every single day! They can be such perves. :blink:
#7
Posted 10 September 2004 - 08:43 PM
Haha, is everyone talking about me joking with Sheba or is this something alot have people been doing?
Just like to add the glitches on GSW are so fun, there is no roof non-climable for Anubis! :blink:
#8
Posted 11 September 2004 - 02:48 AM
Same here Anubis. A group of us in my timezone worked out how to enter any sprite we want. It's always nice to stand on the roof of the center house and watch people try to get on :D.
If you get stalked, just stand still and ignore them. They get bored eventually :angry: :blink:.
#9
Posted 11 September 2004 - 09:18 AM
Anubis, on Sep 10 2004, 07:43 PM, said:
Haha, is everyone talking about me joking with Sheba or is this something alot have people been doing?
Just like to add the glitches on GSW are so fun, there is no roof non-climable for Anubis! :blink:
Not really you, alot of people have been doing this. And you stopped after awhile anyway. :D
Geez I've already reported 2 people!
Thats a good idea Neon, and we need more than 1 person in each timezone.
#10
Posted 11 September 2004 - 09:33 AM
#11
Posted 11 September 2004 - 11:32 AM
#12 Guest_AkaiOnaga_*
Posted 12 September 2004 - 05:08 AM
Kikuichimonji, if someone hids in the screen, you can still see his name from the message box. (a little right from where you type the letters). This is handy when someone becomes "a ghost" and hides behind the golden sun. :P
#13
Posted 12 September 2004 - 06:07 AM
It's now become a daily dance.
And I'm still being stalked. -.-;;
#14
Posted 12 September 2004 - 06:14 AM
What i hate is those who goes around doing ? and ! al the tim and writes
ghfasjdhfgahsd bdgfhjsdkgfhjkfd
kinda annoying, especially in the chat house.
#16
Posted 12 September 2004 - 07:20 AM
1. Email a few users asking them to keep their eyes peeled for trouble makers and to send a report on what they've done, if this users name has popped in in several of the "Watchers" email reports, then you know this person is a troublemaker and should be banned.
2. Or, make a more advanced reporting system where if a person get's bad feedback let's say 10 times in 2 weeks, he is given a temporary ban, when the temp. ban expires and he gets anotehr load of bad deedback, he/she is permanantly banned.
That's my 2 penny's there for you all.
#17
Posted 12 September 2004 - 07:23 AM
but its just a theory
#18
Posted 12 September 2004 - 11:07 AM
#19
Posted 12 September 2004 - 11:30 AM
I think about 3 -active- (<---note the EMPHASIS on active) moderators for it to work. And of course, no system is perfect and without fault. I'm sure there is going to be the occassional person that goes unpunished or unreported, but that is going to happen no matter what system we use.
#20 Guest_Erceon_*
Posted 13 September 2004 - 11:12 AM
#21
Posted 13 September 2004 - 11:48 AM
#22
Posted 13 September 2004 - 08:13 PM
#23
Posted 13 September 2004 - 08:25 PM
Anubis, on Sep 13 2004, 09:13 PM, said:
The same thing applies to moderating a forum. No, moderators cannot be on the whole time. They don't schedule when they get on, usually. The GSW mods would handle things as they seem them, or they are reported to them by other GSWers that were online. It doesn't need to be perfect. No system of enforcement is.
Either that or they are committed to their jobs. As I said, of course there will be people that get away, but that's not really the point. IMO, it would be more beneficial than not having moderators at all, even if it can't cover everything. :blink:
#24
Posted 13 September 2004 - 08:26 PM
EDIT: And what Meglo said too. :blink:
#25
Posted 13 September 2004 - 08:28 PM
I say we try out whatever system Max and AveneR decide to implement, and see how that works before thinking up our own ideas.. :blink:
#26
Posted 13 September 2004 - 10:14 PM
#27
Posted 15 September 2004 - 01:38 PM
#29
Posted 15 September 2004 - 08:22 PM
Anubis, on Sep 15 2004, 02:38 PM, said:
I assume that is how it would work.
That's how it is on forums, too.
#31
Posted 16 September 2004 - 05:28 AM
You wouldn't have Americans getting on at 1am to watch over Australians :lol:.