Al Gored indecision 2000
#1
Posted 21 June 2006 - 05:47 PM
#2
Posted 21 June 2006 - 05:49 PM
Gore won the election. He won the popular vote, and because of some faulty ballots in Florida, he lost to Bush in the courts. The Supreme Court judges who oversaw those courts were all known to be Republican. What do you expect?
#3
Posted 21 June 2006 - 05:51 PM
Sea_of_Time, on Jun 21 2006, 07:31 PM, said:
The Supreme Court of Justice defied what the American people said, it's as simple as that.
That's the kind of talk that got this started. Yes Gore won the popular vote, which is a sham. The president is actually chosen by the electiral college. NOT the Supreme Court. The SC just denied Gore his pointless and demeaning hand recount.
#4
Posted 21 June 2006 - 05:53 PM
#5
Posted 21 June 2006 - 05:58 PM
A recount would've done nothing to correct for the damage done by voter cataracts. If the ballots were filled out incorrectly, staring at them will accomplish nothing so far as determining the true intent of the voters.
#6
Posted 21 June 2006 - 06:00 PM
In any case, the courts were still predominantly Republican, and there is a good chance that they did not give a fair shake at the trial.
#7
Posted 21 June 2006 - 06:07 PM
Sea_of_Time, on Jun 21 2006, 07:53 PM, said:
Allright fine. You were right when you said that the ballots were completely meaningless. Friggin' Nader could've won Florida. But you have no way of proving it.
#8
Posted 21 June 2006 - 06:09 PM
#9
Posted 21 June 2006 - 06:13 PM
#10
Posted 21 June 2006 - 09:01 PM
#11
Posted 23 June 2006 - 07:55 PM
I still think Al Gore won and I stand by that, even though others may disagree.
#12
Posted 03 July 2006 - 12:23 AM
I'm inclined to agree with SoT though, I believe Bush didn't win that election. Of course I baise my opinion on Michael Moore's arguements.
#13
Posted 03 July 2006 - 05:21 AM
And yes, SoT is candaidan. :P
#14
Posted 03 July 2006 - 07:07 AM
Look, if you've ever taken AP American history, you learn very fast that our system isn't perfect. (It's just better than yours! :P ) In an ideal world, the person best fit for the job would get elected. Yet no perfect world exists, so back here in reality, the person who's best at getting elected gets elected.
#15
Posted 03 July 2006 - 08:05 AM
#16
Posted 03 July 2006 - 08:12 AM
And we do have a say. I wish it could be a say in the legal process by legitimate legislative means, but we can settle for our First Amendment rights. Because if there's one thing we can do, it's protest stuff.
#17
Posted 03 July 2006 - 08:44 AM
George Bush is a known member, so is John Kerry, Bill Clinton, Queen Elizabeth, I think Tony Blair. So is all the top officials of all the big organisations, WTO, World Bank.
#18
Posted 03 July 2006 - 09:35 AM
#19
Posted 10 July 2006 - 04:37 PM
#20
Posted 10 July 2006 - 04:47 PM
Platinum Sun, on Jul 3 2006, 09:07 AM, said:
I totally said that already... (Except for the yelling at Eugine part, w00t @ Toasty for that!) but thanks for agreeing with me.
#21
Posted 10 July 2006 - 04:59 PM
#22
Posted 10 July 2006 - 05:02 PM
#23
Posted 10 July 2006 - 06:27 PM
#24
Posted 10 July 2006 - 06:37 PM
#25
Posted 10 July 2006 - 08:55 PM
Also, I wasn't even talking about that Toasty, I was talking about the Free Masonic group which controls American politics. Don't believe me? You must start to watch the history channel and don't believe everything your history teacher teaches you.
Link removed because people are critising the "source" and not the information the source had. I'm really stupid myself I should have known it would have gotten that reaction because of the people who wrote it
http://www.masonicinfo.com/famous1.htm
http://www.masonicinfo.com/famous2.htm
Take some time and read through them. You'd be surprised how much American history revolves around it.
Also, if your mind is too weak, and need some enjoyment in understanding the Free Masons, watch "National Treasure", they have some basic information about it.
#26
Posted 11 July 2006 - 06:38 AM
Quote
Then how come I've never heard of it, ever?
You can't keep something that big hidden. Trust me our government has tried. I skimmed the mantra on the site. This is clearly a religious organization, which shoots down all its credibility right there.
Did you actually read the links you posted? The first thing is says under the "Who are we" link is:
Quote
Call me naive, but that dosn't sound like a covert government subversion operation. And did you look at that list!? Very few of those people are still alive! (FYI: No one's going to be like: "ZOMG! they got the PM of Canada fron 80 years ago!")
This isn't even a good whacked conspiracy theory. And I live in America, so trust me, I've heard some awesome whacked conspiracy theories from mediums much more trustworthy than this.
I do watch the history channel. I saw the special on the Freemasons. They told the truth about the great and powerful freemasons who helped found America and then vanished about 150 years ago! It's time for you to stop believing everything you read on the internet and start listening to your history teacher.
#27
Posted 11 July 2006 - 07:45 AM
Well, here's it an explanation of the Free Masons.
Free Masonry was established really around the time of King Solomon as a secret society for devout Christians; it remained so until an anti-religious group called the Illuminati infiltrated the Masonic Lodges to hide because the Vatican was trying to pin down on members to protect its religion. Doing so, the Illuminati *vanished*, many people believed the group disappeared, but it didn't.
Eventually, Free Masonry and Illuminati beliefs practically merged to become to modern Free Masonry we all know. Similar secret societies include the Skull and Bones, one which George Bush is a known member off. http://en.wikipedia....Skull_and_Bones
Eventually, after the conquest of the New World, high ranked Masons like George Washington and Benjamin Franklin were awarded the option of controlling the New World (North America) and ensuring that the Masonic principles were established, yet hidden among normal, everyday people.
Examples were the US dollar and the American flag - yes, the flag.
American flag:
http://freemasonrywa...ics/us-flag.gif
http://freemasonrywa.../Franceflag.gif
Quote
As you can see, it's either the Free Masons purposely made the American flag that way, or it's a HUGE coincidence. Choose which ever one you believe. There's alot more evidence, I just lost my links.
Dollar:
ftp://www.kena.org/h.../DOLLAR.EXP.txt
That link is pretty boring for me, so I can’t summarize. Read if interested.
Anyway, up to modern times. George Bush I was a known Skull and Bones member, always talking about a "new world order" in his speeches. Also, the Free Masonic case was closed by the CIA in George Bush time for lack of proof, but one can speculate he closed it on purpose to protect his society...
Anyway, so why am I posting this long post and why does it belong to this topic? I really wanted to make you Americans aware of the societies which is in your land, and frankly controls politics, of course I may not be correct, I'm just relaying what famous Historians and Masons wrote in books, on the internet. The "Al gored" topic has a twist to it, and please open your mind to possibilities, maybe this isn’t a fact, but it sure is possible.
#28
Posted 11 July 2006 - 08:43 AM
Corruption of our system is a reality, but not on an organized scale. It's always one guy (Ex. Abramoff) that's using their influence to siphon money/cover the past/ get-out-of-jail-free /buy drugs etc. Whoever it is, he's always alone. Politicians are way too selfish to coordinate their corruption. If they ever work together on a scam, they always sell eachother out. Our media crys bloody murder about legitamate political actions all the time. They'd never get away with anything of this scale under that microscope.
#29
Posted 12 July 2006 - 10:58 AM
#30
Posted 16 July 2006 - 03:46 PM
Anyway, I'm done with my conspiracy theories <_<
#31
Posted 16 July 2006 - 04:02 PM
And yes, technically "George Bush" was the old one and "George W. Bush" is the new one. But if you just say "George Bush" people will assume that you're talking about the current one. To get the point across clearly, use "George Bush Sr." or "George H. W. Bush."