Inauguration I can't believe someone who isn't American is making this topi
#1
Posted 20 January 2009 - 12:03 PM
I wish he was British.
#3
Posted 20 January 2009 - 12:43 PM
Disgusting.
#6
Posted 20 January 2009 - 02:23 PM
The speech itself was fairly typical of Obama, hardly anything new. Reaching out to the Muslim world is a good step, but I wish he was more like Ron Paul in his foreign policy. Too imperialistic/militaristic as always for America.
I did not like the overall condescending tone that came from the inauguration itself - the person who introduced everyone (Senator Diane Feinstein?) made a remark that America is showing the world how to use the "ballot, not bullet" in their political systems.
It felt like the same old American self-centered attribute of "we're on top, everyone wants to be like us".
tl;dr - decent, not great.
#8
Posted 20 January 2009 - 03:00 PM
I suppose it was a rare ceremony and all.
#9
Posted 20 January 2009 - 03:07 PM
I think the problem is, all the important points (the problems around the world, the fact that Obama is the first African-American President) have already been made and that there wasn't much more to add.
#12
Posted 20 January 2009 - 04:18 PM
#14
Posted 20 January 2009 - 07:27 PM
Keep in mind this is largely the same set up the inauguration ceremony has had in the USA for a while now, only different people present, and perhaps the largest crowd to date.
#16
Posted 20 January 2009 - 08:56 PM
#18
Posted 21 January 2009 - 12:02 AM
But I seriously don't get why everyone's practically crying tears of awe over the whole inauguration thing. I mean, seriously. We we're going to get a black president one day. It's not too surprising to me.
I don't care what party/ethnic background he's from. I'll only praise him if he does a good job leading the country.
#19
Posted 21 January 2009 - 02:00 AM
TheEnglishman, on Jan 20 2009, 08:08 PM, said:
The speech itself was just 1 of the 44 others. Didn't find it epic, nor bad.
Golden Legacy, on Jan 20 2009, 09:23 PM, said:
YES!
I agree, the only country who probably thanks god more in their inaguration (or any equivalent of it) is probably the Vatican.
#21
Posted 21 January 2009 - 02:14 AM
Burnie Burns, on Jan 20 2009, said:
But, I played back the moment tonight and looked up the oath and I was amazed -- it really wasn't Obama's fault. Justice Roberts left out a word, which is where Obama stopped. The oath is as follows:
Quote
For some reason, Roberts moved or omitted the word "faithfully" from the oath when he initially read it and when Obama got to that place in the oath, he paused. Roberts said it again, correcting his mistake on the next pass.
I call a do-over. Everyone go back tomorrow and let's try this again.
#23
Posted 21 January 2009 - 05:20 AM
#24
Posted 21 January 2009 - 10:30 AM
#26
Posted 21 January 2009 - 11:43 AM
#28
Posted 21 January 2009 - 12:54 PM
... that was about in the 17th century.
... and when justice screws up, they don't screw up less badly.
#29
Posted 21 January 2009 - 02:49 PM
TheEnglishman, on Jan 21 2009, 12:30 PM, said:
The transfer of power takes place at 12:00 local time exactly. The oath is done in tradition but is technically optional. Obama was already president, and Bush's term was done, at noon and that was before the oath.
And yes, it was confirmed by political analysts that Obama corrected Chief Justice Roberts during the oath.
#31
Posted 21 January 2009 - 03:28 PM
O yeah, and pissed off Americans and such.
#32
Posted 21 January 2009 - 03:35 PM
http://www.treehugger.com/barack-obama-for-president.jpg
Barack Obama
http://www.gastronomydomine.com/uploaded_images/gordon_brown_fat-749381.jpg
Gordon Brown
Now perhaps you can understand why it is more interesting to follow the actions of American politics than British ones.
#33
Posted 21 January 2009 - 03:42 PM
... and that Boris Johnson over in London guy looks... pretty down to earth, if you know what I mean.
#34
Posted 21 January 2009 - 04:01 PM
And Boris is very... unique.
#35
Posted 21 January 2009 - 05:00 PM
Stating the obvious so that nobody else has to.
#38
Posted 22 January 2009 - 05:05 PM
There. Everyone shut up and watch it. And listen to GL.
Eat your ****in' vegetables too you dumb ****s.
#40
Posted 29 January 2009 - 10:06 PM
TheEnglishman, on Jan 21 2009, 05:35 PM, said:
It can be very interesting when parliament is in session. I remember watching a session last year where everyone was shouting at each other, and everyone looked so sweaty. Funny stuff. It was amazing to see Gordon Brown yelling and looking all sweaty.
Btw, I actually like David Cameron. I think he's the Barack Obama of UK =]
When is election in UK anyway?
Btw, this was the funniest parliament fight ever:
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=cD0XZlxKuig
And to think, these are the well respected people of beautiful Ukraine.
Oh,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sY5GjYrclgM...feature=related
Democracy in the Middle East baby!
#41
Posted 30 January 2009 - 10:12 AM
The election is when Gordon Brown decides to call one I believe. Though he only has so long before he has to call one.
#42
Posted 08 April 2009 - 02:34 PM
Eugine, on Jan 30 2009, 05:06 AM, said:
It can be very interesting when parliament is in session. I remember watching a session last year where everyone was shouting at each other, and everyone looked so sweaty. Funny stuff. It was amazing to see Gordon Brown yelling and looking all sweaty.
Btw, I actually like David Cameron. I think he's the Barack Obama of UK =]
When is election in UK anyway?
Btw, this was the funniest parliament fight ever:
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=cD0XZlxKuig
And to think, these are the well respected people of beautiful Ukraine.
Oh,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sY5GjYrclgM...feature=related
Democracy in the Middle East baby!
Because conservatives are not bastards amirite? (Talking about the party BTW).