Frankly, I think the game is a simple remake
#1
Posted 14 June 2009 - 07:01 PM
I chalk it up to Nintendo giving a wrong description of the game. There's been lots of times that a game has had a wrong description when first announced.
I love the art and it's new rendition of the characters. ^.^
*Pumps fist in air* Isaac, Garet and Mia!! O:<
#2
Posted 14 June 2009 - 10:54 PM
#3
Posted 14 June 2009 - 11:00 PM
Not bashing you or anything.
#5
Posted 14 June 2009 - 11:59 PM
And I know about the press release. I'm waiting until word from the Developers comes out as to what this is.
#7
Posted 15 June 2009 - 12:14 AM
#8
Posted 15 June 2009 - 01:26 AM
That troll is a spy?
#9
Posted 15 June 2009 - 02:28 AM
#10
Posted 15 June 2009 - 12:17 PM
I mean, the art style is obviously of another artist (and I like it!!), so he could be putting his own spin on how the characters look.
I am waiting for the DEVELOPER (Camelot) to release more info, not on the PUBLISHER (Nintendo), who only license and publish the game. Maybe there's a few Nintendo employee's in on the team, but still... Just waiting for Camelot.
If the game IS about descendants, I'll apologize for my "differing" opinion, seeing as how it's blasphemy to question Nintendo's word.
#11
Posted 15 June 2009 - 12:28 PM
#12
Posted 15 June 2009 - 02:32 PM
OtakuRPGamer, on Jun 15 2009, 08:17 PM, said:
I mean, the art style is obviously of another artist (and I like it!!), so he could be putting his own spin on how the characters look.
I am waiting for the DEVELOPER (Camelot) to release more info, not on the PUBLISHER (Nintendo), who only license and publish the game. Maybe there's a few Nintendo employee's in on the team, but still... Just waiting for Camelot.
If the game IS about descendants, I'll apologize for my "differing" opinion, seeing as how it's blasphemy to question Nintendo's word.
I totally disagree with you. You say Mia, Garet and Isaac are prominent on the new artwork. I have to agree with the fact that the guy in the front does look like Isaac. However, the guy with the red hair looks only a little like Garet (different nose etc.) and the 'mysterious girl' looks in NO WAY like Mia. No way at all. I'm very sure this will not be a remake; why on earth would you change the artwork so severely for just that? It wouldn't make any sense. I respect your opinion, but I think you should roll it over once more; would a remake really make sense, if you look at the artwork? I don't think so.
#13
Posted 15 June 2009 - 03:29 PM
#14
Posted 15 June 2009 - 03:56 PM
#15
Posted 15 June 2009 - 05:42 PM
I also agree that the girl in the artwork looks nothing like Mia. Even if it's a different style, there's just not enough of a resemblance.
But hey, at this point in time, the whole thing is wide open for speculation. There really aren't enough details to draw a clear picture on this matter.
#16
Posted 15 June 2009 - 07:42 PM
Again, I'm not bashing your opinion, it's just sort of far-fetched is all.
#18
Posted 15 June 2009 - 10:24 PM
I will also say that OtakuRPGamer's point on reading into information from the publisher vs. the developer is a good distinction and one worth noting.
#19
Posted 15 June 2009 - 11:02 PM
#20
Posted 15 June 2009 - 11:24 PM
#21
Posted 15 June 2009 - 11:43 PM
Someone Else, on Jun 16 2009, 05:24 PM, said:
Yea I supose you have a point. But yeah I'd much rather have a GS3.
On another GS note, did anyone read the Golden Sun novel that was done by Master of Reality over at fanfiction.net? It was really well done. It seemed like the game was based on the book.
#22
Posted 16 June 2009 - 04:19 AM
#23
Posted 16 June 2009 - 04:31 AM
Kaj, on Jun 16 2009, 10:19 PM, said:
I'd agree with you there. But Im about 75% sure it wont be a remake. I just wanna know even just a little bit more about the story. Not a big amount just enough to tease me and hype me up for it even more.
#24
Posted 16 June 2009 - 03:45 PM
Kaj, on Jun 16 2009, 03:19 AM, said:
We can't be absolutely sure that the places shown in the video/demo will even be in the game. Chances are, what was there was just thrown together for the purposes of having something tangible to show.
#25
Posted 16 June 2009 - 10:09 PM
If it's a remake, then apparently it's going to feature Master Hand with a time machine. While I'm posting in this area, I'ma just throw in that I think there'll be some siblings.
#26
Posted 18 June 2009 - 07:12 AM
Are we going to see some sort of Jenna - Ivan Hybrid or something?
#27
Posted 19 June 2009 - 12:09 AM
King of Town, on Jun 19 2009, 01:12 AM, said:
Are we going to see some sort of Jenna - Ivan Hybrid or something?
Ok that just gave me a really disturbing image lol. But it just says descendants so it could be 40 years from the original. We could be looking at Isaac's great great grandchild. So it was very vage. We'll just have to wait till we got some more concrete info.
#28
Posted 19 June 2009 - 12:20 AM
#29
Posted 19 June 2009 - 01:14 AM
Split got told.
#30
Posted 19 June 2009 - 11:20 AM
Great, great, great, grandchildren.
Almost xD. 48.
#31
Posted 19 June 2009 - 04:44 PM
#33
Posted 19 June 2009 - 07:45 PM
Its pretty much 100% that this new game isn't just a remake.
#34
Posted 19 June 2009 - 09:46 PM
Dunno, everybody's pretty much said what they think about it being a remake or not, unless somebody has another point to make.
#36
Posted 20 June 2009 - 11:59 PM
Bomberman65, on Jun 18 2009, 11:09 PM, said:
LOLOLOLOLOL please post a lot.
OtakuRPGamer (and everyone else for that matter), please keep in mind we have a 5 word minimum on posts. Also, keep posts relevant to the topic. If there's a problem with people going off-topic, please use the report button rather than trying to be a hero. ;D
I have already said what I've wanted to say on this matter, and I think everyone else has as well. I'm going to close this topic unless another staffer sees it fit to keep it open.
#37
Posted 22 June 2009 - 11:18 PM
Carry on.
lol, five dollars says this is the last post, or close to it.
-pdm
#38
Posted 23 June 2009 - 07:30 PM
And thats just the first step in a long long process, to even begin making the game.
#40
Posted 24 June 2009 - 11:06 AM
#41
Posted 25 June 2009 - 11:46 PM
It might even make more sense than a full GS3, in some regards.
#43
Posted 26 June 2009 - 01:20 AM
#44
Posted 02 July 2009 - 10:59 AM
Golden Legacy, on Jun 25 2009, 10:46 PM, said:
It might even make more sense than a full GS3, in some regards.
It could be a remake, but Nintendo wouldn't be able to get away with saying what they did. I'm sure Camelot would have came out by now with a statement correcting them. And I'm not sure how keen Nintendo would be on a remake, sure some people haven't played the past games, but maybe thats why they are descendants? Half the time I think of descendants I think they usually mean quite a while into the "future" I mean, your parents don't call you their descendants do they? It would just be silly.
#45
Posted 02 July 2009 - 03:33 PM