Split's Topic Of 'Impressive' Artwork Wow, I'm famous.
#1
Posted 19 December 2005 - 01:34 AM
Okay! I got something happening here, tell me what you think. I want honest opinions, and suggestions on how I can improve:
http://img482.imageshack.us/img482/8186/transparentcolouredsquares2vx.png
#2
Posted 19 December 2005 - 02:49 AM
But more importantly: What is it? Or what does it represent?
Tip of the day: If you want to to graphical art of whatever, invest in Adobe Photoshop.
#3
Posted 19 December 2005 - 03:21 AM
#4
Posted 19 December 2005 - 04:40 AM
I created it through clever use of overlapping rectangles and transparent colours, along with the aforementioned Relief filter. Gotta love them filters. Well, I'll see ya tomorrow...yawn...
#5
Posted 19 December 2005 - 05:22 AM
E
G
B
D
B
Every good banner deserves bordering.
#6
Posted 19 December 2005 - 08:23 AM
Yeah, you're quite the artist, Split. It's very abstract. Nice job.
#7
Posted 19 December 2005 - 09:23 AM
lol, that makes no sense @_@
There's no skill in there but it looks pretty nifty. So if you take that uncanny skill to make bad images look interesting and then develop some skills through tutorials etc, you should be able to make some really awesome stuff :P.
There's some people around here that take this sort of stuff very seriously (Andross) so maybe they could point you in the right direction.
... damnit that image is so trippy lol O.o. *stares at image*
#11
Posted 19 December 2005 - 08:26 PM
Could a Moderator please spare a moment of his/her time and rename this topic with the word 'Impressive' in single quotation marks? Ta.
#13
Posted 20 December 2005 - 04:51 AM
Please post messages with more meaning - Eugine
This post has been edited by Eugine: 20 December 2005 - 05:22 AM
#14
Posted 20 December 2005 - 06:40 AM
http://img380.imageshack.us/img380/6066/silverscotchtape3by.png
I achieved a surprisingly realistic effect here. I had to sharpen it a few times to get it looking like that. It reminds me of scotch tape. Silver scotch tape.
Oh yes. To all those would-be flamers, these are not meant to be complete works of art; rather, I'm just experimenting to find out what works and what doesn't.
#15
Posted 20 December 2005 - 06:45 AM
Reminds me of a long ribbon that's going every which way. Looks cool.
#16
Posted 20 December 2005 - 06:54 AM
Borzoi has hatched! Booyah! Now, go do my bidding!
#17
Posted 20 December 2005 - 06:56 AM
@Split: Cool art, though a little small. I reckon try some bigger stuff soon :P .
#18
Posted 20 December 2005 - 11:21 AM
#19
Posted 22 December 2005 - 10:56 AM
Critique: It's very small for one - they are just web graphics. Web graphics don't usually count as full-on art pieces.
Second, there's nothing that is compelling, imo, aesthetically in the pieces. There's an understanding of shape and line, but no real employment of color, contrast, composition, etc.
I recommend you try something wallpaper size (1024 X 768)
#20
Posted 22 December 2005 - 12:39 PM
Andross, on Dec 22 2005, 11:56 AM, said:
Critique: It's very small for one - they are just web graphics. Web graphics don't usually count as full-on art pieces.
Second, there's nothing that is compelling, imo, aesthetically in the pieces. There's an understanding of shape and line, but no real employment of color, contrast, composition, etc.
I recommend you try something wallpaper size (1024 X 768)
Translation:
You're a noob at graphic design.
#21
Posted 22 December 2005 - 08:14 PM
#22
Posted 23 December 2005 - 08:20 AM
Split Infinity, on Dec 22 2005, 08:14 PM, said:
I'm sorry, but that's simply not true.
Pixel artists use only Paint for their work, and I've seen some pretty amazing stuff. Granted, you're doing abstract art, but it doesn't necessarily mean you can't do anything good because you don't have the materials you want.
This draws a parallel to photography even. I've seen people take AMAZING pictures with a general point-and-shoot camera. I've also seen incredible pictures from $20 film toy-cameras.
It's about using what you have at the time. Or you could just use TorrentSpy + BitComet - I'm just mentioning them, figure out the rest on your own =P
#25
Posted 23 December 2005 - 08:01 PM
And you're saying that would temporarily make me popular again?
#26
Posted 23 December 2005 - 08:03 PM
#27
Posted 23 December 2005 - 08:51 PM
I've taken roughly 5,000 photos. Maybe only 500 of them have been edited, and then another 100 of which are actually online and well received. But it shouldn't matter how many artworks you have to do to get better - I do photography because I love it.
Simply put, making more art shouldn't be a pain if you like doing it.
#28
Posted 23 December 2005 - 11:48 PM
#29
Posted 23 December 2005 - 11:57 PM
I needn't think I have to say much more on the matter ^_^ .
#30
Posted 24 December 2005 - 12:13 AM
I'm just going to stand in a corner for a few minutes. ^_^
#31
Posted 24 December 2005 - 12:17 AM
If I was any more blunt than that... *rambles*
#32
Posted 24 December 2005 - 12:23 AM
#33
Posted 24 December 2005 - 02:52 AM
#34
Posted 24 December 2005 - 03:19 AM
Agatio, on Dec 24 2005, 03:52 AM, said:
Translation:
You get this cool thingy that can get free stuff. Simply download the program, click the little icon, then search the program, you will find lots of results and lots of viruses, have fun with your cracked and illegal stuff. ^_^
#35
Posted 24 December 2005 - 06:36 AM
Faster for one. More efficient. And larger source for files.
Download it.
Install it.
Then go to the TorrentSpy website. And search around for what you want
It should be pretty obvious what I'm telling you. I won't say it out right though.
#36
Posted 24 December 2005 - 01:02 PM
Anyways, BitComet, BitTorrent, Azureus whatever client you use, it doesn't matter.
The fact is, when it comes to art, it doesnt matter at all what materials you have. The thing thats so great about art is that that rule does not apply whatsoever. Art can be brought to life in so many ways it's not even funny. My art tutor has a bunch of grade 12 students and their learning design and getting their portfolios ready to be sent in, basically the create artwork with whatever they have, paperclips, thread, buttons.... and boy, what came outta those everyday house objects.... $$_$$ lol, jk. Anyways, even at this point even if you had a better program, if your skills dont improve, nothing will ever change. As an artist, you have to have guts, you have to have the passion and modivation to tackle anything that comes your way. For some of us, this has become more than a popularity contest.
#37
Posted 24 December 2005 - 03:29 PM
Julian, on Dec 24 2005, 01:02 PM, said:
Anyways, BitComet, BitTorrent, Azureus whatever client you use, it doesn't matter.
The fact is, when it comes to art, it doesnt matter at all what materials you have. The thing thats so great about art is that that rule does not apply whatsoever. Art can be brought to life in so many ways it's not even funny. My art tutor has a bunch of grade 12 students and their learning design and getting their portfolios ready to be sent in, basically the create artwork with whatever they have, paperclips, thread, buttons.... and boy, what came outta those everyday house objects.... $$_$$ lol, jk. Anyways, even at this point even if you had a better program, if your skills dont improve, nothing will ever change. As an artist, you have to have guts, you have to have the passion and modivation to tackle anything that comes your way. For some of us, this has become more than a popularity contest.
Hear hear!
My photography, by way of selling prints and doing party shoots, will help me pay for college, a car, and a new camera...eventually. My web design also works the same way. And the design of the site is vital, which is an art in itself, as one must utilize graphic design concepts, which basically involves everything - color, line, pattern, composition, contrast.
If you're really passionate, and if you're a true artist, it won't matter if you don't have the greatest equipment all the time.
#38
Posted 24 December 2005 - 03:48 PM
#39
Posted 24 December 2005 - 11:15 PM
Andross, on Dec 23 2005, 09:20 AM, said:
Pixel artists use only Paint for their work, and I've seen some pretty amazing stuff. Granted, you're doing abstract art, but it doesn't necessarily mean you can't do anything good because you don't have the materials you want.
This draws a parallel to photography even. I've seen people take AMAZING pictures with a general point-and-shoot camera. I've also seen incredible pictures from $20 film toy-cameras.
It's about using what you have at the time. Or you could just use TorrentSpy + BitComet - I'm just mentioning them, figure out the rest on your own =P
Pixel art is way different. Have you tried it? Way easier than any graphic art. Don't be hard on him. He's good, not godly like you, Agatio, and the other guys that do awesome graphics around here, but he's good.
#40
Posted 25 December 2005 - 08:49 AM
Piers diamondberg master, on Dec 24 2005, 11:15 PM, said:
I have tried it, and you'd be surprised at how hard it is to make a meaningful icon in only a 4 X 4 space ^_^
And who gives a sh!t about whether people think I'm "godly" or not? Just b/c you say he's good doesn't mean I can't critique his work truthfully. It's more helpful to point out problems and give suggestions than to just say 'yeah, those are good.'
#41
Posted 25 December 2005 - 01:29 PM