Most Underrated Games Of All Time
#1
Posted 30 August 2007 - 06:22 PM
The most underrated game EVER that I own would be The Neverhood. This game is extremely imaginative, very funny, and just awesome to look at. Screw 3D games with next-gen graphics, I like looking at all the clay creations. It's a mystery game like Myst, but better. Also has very funny voice acting. I've had this game for a while, my parents bought in 96 and played it for a while, but at one point it got scratched and our computer couldn't read it. Our computer has been upgraded since then, including new disc drives, and apparently these new disc drives have more tolerance to scratches, since I just beat it.
Another underrated game is Dark Messiah. I'll admit though, I don't actually own it, but I've played the demo and my friend is looking to get it.
#2
Posted 30 August 2007 - 08:22 PM
But lets see... Age of Empires III was excellent for me, but all of my friends underrated it. To this day I find myself playing AoEII multiplayer rather than AoE3.
#3
Posted 31 August 2007 - 02:05 AM
#5
Posted 31 August 2007 - 04:50 AM
Eugine, on Aug 31 2007, 04:22 AM, said:
Same here.
Anyhow, do you mean underrated in reviews WD, or in sales or what? If we're talking about reviews than most of the Pokemon games. They never got very good scores. Still who cares when they're selling like crazy? If we're speaking of sales, then definitely F-Zero GX. So much was put into that game, so much effort and money and time and it barely left the shelves.
#7
Posted 31 August 2007 - 10:12 AM
Aquamarine, on Aug 31 2007, 03:50 AM, said:
That game I posted up there, The Neverhood, got awesome reviews and even won a few awards, yet it sold terribly. On the other hand, Dark Messiah didn't get the best reviews yet it's still fun. Mostly I was thinking sales, but it doesn't have to be.
I'm not quite sure what you're talking with there Pokemon. Pokemon games get good scores, and if anything Pokemon is probably overrated. It's the same thing every time yet it still sells millions.
#8
Posted 31 August 2007 - 10:35 AM
Aquamarine, on Aug 31 2007, 06:50 AM, said:
Same here.
Anyhow, do you mean underrated in reviews WD, or in sales or what? If we're talking about reviews than most of the Pokemon games. They never got very good scores. Still who cares when they're selling like crazy? If we're speaking of sales, then definitely F-Zero GX. So much was put into that game, so much effort and money and time and it barely left the shelves.
Good example Aqua. While F-Zero GX was a fantastic game with huge production values and effort, Mario Kart: Double Dash had much less review scores (7.9 vs. F-Zero's 9.3 on IGN, for example), yet sold about ten times as much. Really unfair.
#9
Posted 31 August 2007 - 10:41 AM
#10
Posted 31 August 2007 - 10:59 AM
#11
Posted 31 August 2007 - 01:09 PM
Wind Dude, on Aug 31 2007, 06:12 PM, said:
You're quite right, but even the first Pokemon games got lower scores then they should have. I agree they're pretty much the same thing though, and seeing as every Poke game sells millions of copies I can't say I'm really sorry for the games getting lower reviews than I believe they should have.
I'm REALLY sorry for F-Zero GX though. I just can't say this enough. That game deserved to be one of five best selling GC games, it was that good. I honestly don't see why it sold so poorly. It should have sold way better than Double Dash, Mario Sunshine and even Wind Waker.
#12
Posted 31 August 2007 - 02:24 PM
#13
Posted 31 August 2007 - 02:31 PM
#14
Posted 31 August 2007 - 03:00 PM
Golden Legacy, on Aug 31 2007, 10:24 PM, said:
I know you love Wind Waker, but I don't really see why. Don't get me wrong, it's a great game and all, but not as good as you say. It was WAAAAY overrated in reviews. Although it was one of the funnest games I've ever played, it was just do darn short and easy and it felt like a lot of things were missing. They obviously hurried with the creation of the game already after the second dungeon, since it afterwards didn't have as many cool ideas and touches as it did in the beginning and all the items in the second half of the game are from old Zelda's. The "amazing" depth the characters had because of the faces they made only worked for Link, Tetra and a few others. Heck, the people in Clock Town in Majora's Mask were much fuller of life and emotions than the people of Windfall.
There are many, many more things I can say about Wind Waker, but I'm going finish now. Everyone has a right to their own opinion. I'll just add that Wind Waker was probably the worst Zelda I've ever played. Though I still loved it.
#16
Posted 31 August 2007 - 04:26 PM
Aquamarine, on Aug 31 2007, 05:00 PM, said:
There are many, many more things I can say about Wind Waker, but I'm going finish now. Everyone has a right to their own opinion. I'll just add that Wind Waker was probably the worst Zelda I've ever played. Though I still loved it.
Of course we're entitled to our opinions, but I just want to defend WW in this different way.
Wind Waker, at its best moments, rivaled that of any other Zelda played, in my opinion. Don't think of it in terms of how it ultimately turned out, think about the entire aspect of it. An almost painting like setting and flow of the environments, realistic emotions, amazing draw distance, etc.
Think of it this way - if WW had as many dungeons as Twilight Princess or Ocarina of Time, and was as difficult and as long - then, pound for pound, WW completely blows them out of the water. It's just so different.
#18
Posted 31 August 2007 - 06:04 PM
NFS: Porsche Unleashed was and is a great game in my eyes. The tracks were stunning and lifelike, and the level of customizeation for the cars bordered on real life. I'm not sure what it got in reviews, but a lot of people I know who have played more current NFS titles, like Most Wanted, would rather play the newer ones. But personally, I'd much rather play Porsche Unleashed.
#21
Posted 01 September 2007 - 04:19 AM
Golden Legacy, on Sep 1 2007, 12:26 AM, said:
You may be right about that. Then again, you're telling me to imagine Wind Waker as a much better and very different game. One could say that about any video game. But the temples of WW were so small and bland compared to the temples of OoT. Just compare the Wind Temple to Spirit Temple. Spirit Temple was so big, atmospheric and just plain awesome, while Wind Temple had nothing very interesting or new.
Every Zelda I've played had a different, but distinct feel to it. WW had the least pronounced and worst feel to it, worse than OoT, MM and maybe even Minish Cap.
#22
Posted 01 September 2007 - 01:28 PM
#23
Posted 02 September 2007 - 05:49 AM
Aquamarine, on Sep 1 2007, 03:19 AM, said:
For a newb to the series, like me (well, I had played a little bit of some of the GBC games), those dungeons were pretty big. Especially the tower of the gods and the wind temple. But, like I said, it was my first console zelda, so I guess it just depends on your background. Infact, I probably would rather play WW over OoT or MW because of the larger and harder temples. Heck, the main reason I left the game alone for so long was because I got fed up with the tower of the gods. Since though, I've gotten to gannon's lair. But I've only been able to even get to one boss.
#24
Posted 02 September 2007 - 05:53 AM
And Toasty, you should download OoT and MM for Virtual Console. Really, you don't know what you're missing out on.
#25
Posted 02 September 2007 - 06:00 AM
And not all vg's are hard for me, I'm just better at strategy games than most other genre's of games. Save for SSBM of course. And I'm decent at Guitar Hero. But I suck at Halo.
#26
Posted 30 September 2007 - 11:45 PM
I guess you could say I rarely play underrated games, unless you consider Golden Sun an underrated series.
#28
Posted 01 October 2007 - 04:07 PM
I don't know if I'd say Golden Sun is underrated. I guess it is, but I know at least 3 people in real life who have played it. Not bad for an RPG on the GBA.
#29
Posted 01 October 2007 - 04:09 PM
#30
Posted 01 October 2007 - 04:12 PM