This is a new weekly poll I am making that allows you to choose between two games that are similar in genre, popularity, etc.
This week, I am featuring to bigtime Strategy games for the GBA. Final Fantasy Tactics Advance, and Fire Emblem.
Please, also add why you chose the game you did!
Now's your chance to voice your choice! Vote now!
Page 1 of 1
Sea Of Time's Gaming Poll: Week 1 FFTA vs. Fire Emblem
#2
Posted 11 March 2005 - 08:04 PM
Fire emblem.
They were both AWESOMEAWESOMEAWESOME games, yet, FE was better.
They were both AWESOMEAWESOMEAWESOME games, yet, FE was better.
#4
Posted 12 March 2005 - 10:06 PM
I lost interest in FE after the more difficult chapters got to me. But when I played the FFTA ROM, the battles were okay, but there was lesser storyline to it I think.
All in all, I'd say FE was a tad better than FFTA. But not a whole lot.
All in all, I'd say FE was a tad better than FFTA. But not a whole lot.
#6
Posted 13 March 2005 - 01:19 PM
Fire Emblem. I'd say the battle systems are equally good. I liked FF:TA a lot I completed it but the storyline was kinda naff. FE's story is a really good story so FE > FF:TA.
#7
Posted 13 March 2005 - 05:31 PM
FFTA. I never played FE, but heard it kinda sucked on some other forums...
#8
Posted 14 March 2005 - 04:40 PM
So, Fire Emblem has taken a small lead going into the last four days. You still have lots of time to vote, everyone who hasn't already!
#10
Posted 17 March 2005 - 11:20 AM
I voted null because I haven't played FFTA.
FE was a good game but I can't compare it with FFTA.
FE was a good game but I can't compare it with FFTA.
Page 1 of 1