Abortion
#1
Posted 28 April 2005 - 07:22 PM
I will not put any religion into this, so it can be openly discussed for all. Do not just post your opinion, elaborate.
Pregnacy and Conception ARE Different
Conception is the moment and time the sperm and egg are combined. The cells do not turn into an embryo until 10 days later, when it is attached to the uterus wall. When attached, it is then an embryo and the female is now pregnant.
What is Pro-Choice?
Pro-Choice is anyone who may be for or against abortion, but believes also in the opinion that the mother has the right to choose, the consequences are her problem and what ever she does is her own right.
What is Anti-abortion?
Anti-abortionists are completely against abortion, enough said. Ideas of them include that is a woman is raped and gets pregant, because when raped, she should go to the police WITHIN 10 DAYS. If she does, she is given a pill that makes it so the two gametes flowing cannot connect to the uterus wall. This pill is called the "Morning After" pill. if they do not give this to her, she is to ASK.
My Take
I am an Anit-abortionist. I wouls post all my ideas, but I have no time. I'll post them later, I guess.
#2
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:07 PM
#3
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:16 PM
#4
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:21 PM
#5
Posted 28 April 2005 - 09:54 PM
#6
Posted 29 April 2005 - 12:00 AM
#7
Posted 29 April 2005 - 03:31 AM
#8
Posted 29 April 2005 - 06:35 AM
People are stupid when they do it!
When your having sex without condom you can be sure you get pregnant. If it's your first time and you got pregnant then you should have listen more to yo mom and pop more about the flowers and the bees ;) .
But if the girl/woman was being raped I understand why you do abortion. The child will look alot like his father and you got a feeling something from that man is inside of you, which I don't think it's a nice feeling :ph34r: .
#9
Posted 29 April 2005 - 08:51 AM
We recently had a debate about this in my class and the first thing a guy said was:
"Men should also have the choice to do abortion when they are pregnant." He wasn't joking about it, he was serious. We had to tell him why men can't be pregnant.
#10
Posted 29 April 2005 - 08:05 PM
#11
Posted 29 April 2005 - 08:12 PM
Quote
Sooner or later Izar, you will have to realise that not everyone is Christian.
#12
Posted 30 April 2005 - 09:04 AM
#14
Posted 30 April 2005 - 09:52 AM
My view on abortion is that it shouldn't happen. Why?
Well gather 'round ye children and I shall tell you a tale:
One of mystery, enchantment and of the magical invention of contraceptives. :)
ie: Abortion shouldn't need to be contemplated in the first place.
Just think, if they allowed it, stem cell research would continue. And then cloning humans could be made possible. And THEN, Anubis might be cloned. Need I say more? lol
#15
Posted 30 April 2005 - 10:05 AM
#16
Posted 30 April 2005 - 10:10 AM
But I completley agree, even though I don't 100% understand what it is that you just said :)
#17
Posted 30 April 2005 - 10:51 AM
#18
Posted 30 April 2005 - 08:19 PM
This is a pretty delicate subject...
#19
Posted 01 May 2005 - 03:51 PM
#20
Posted 09 August 2006 - 07:34 AM
#21
Posted 09 August 2006 - 11:51 AM
#22
Posted 09 August 2006 - 12:17 PM
*Waits to get yelled at*
#23
Posted 09 August 2006 - 12:30 PM
Murder means killing, ending someone's life. The child is ALIVE. It is a seperate being from the mother, yet it just hasn't had a chance to enter the world yet. The moment the child is conceived, it is a separate being; not part of the mother and father anymore, but a developing, whole new person.
If an embryo doesn't exist, then does that mean humans are all empty shells, as things inside don't "exist"?
#24
Posted 09 August 2006 - 12:38 PM
- Embryos don't have life yet
- Embryos don't feel pain yet
- A life can't end before it has started
- At least from a biological standpoint, the child is not a seperate being from its mother, since it cannot survive as such
- Embryos exist, they just are not conscious, and thus do not enjoy the same rights as conscious people.
#25
Posted 09 August 2006 - 12:45 PM
#26
Posted 09 August 2006 - 02:28 PM
Mars Djinni, on Aug 9 2006, 02:30 PM, said:
Murder means killing, ending someone's life. The child is ALIVE. It is a seperate being from the mother, yet it just hasn't had a chance to enter the world yet. The moment the child is conceived, it is a separate being; not part of the mother and father anymore, but a developing, whole new person.
If an embryo doesn't exist, then does that mean humans are all empty shells, as things inside don't "exist"?
I side with MD on this one completely. The embryo is already alive; just the fact that it exists means that it will someday grow to be a human being with consciousness. Abortion robs that unjustly and effectively kills the human being. From the moment it is conceived, that "potential" (for lack of a better word) is there, and by taking that away, it is no different than cold-blooded murder.
#27
Posted 09 August 2006 - 02:33 PM
#28
Posted 09 August 2006 - 02:53 PM
Abortion is a matter of life and death, NOT MEANINGLESS JUNK.
#29
Posted 09 August 2006 - 02:56 PM
#30
Posted 09 August 2006 - 05:39 PM
Something may be worthless to the eye's glance, but a life is a life, whether it is born or not. It still had a purpose. It still was supposed to be a person. Why is it the parent's choice to prevent their child from having at least some chance at being successful in life? You're right, it isn't murder. It's worse.
You say anything before birth is meaningless. It is. That is, only if one makes it so by blocking it off from the world.
#31
Posted 09 August 2006 - 05:45 PM
#32
Posted 09 August 2006 - 05:47 PM
#33
Posted 09 August 2006 - 05:49 PM
#34
Posted 09 August 2006 - 05:50 PM
#35
Posted 09 August 2006 - 05:56 PM
#37
Posted 09 August 2006 - 06:01 PM
#38
Posted 09 August 2006 - 06:07 PM
People have this idea that they can't control themselves, they can't restrain with any effort, etc.
THIS NOTION HAS TO STOP. Stop saying people are doomed to repeat irresponsible sex, stop accepting that people can't change in that way. People need to be EDUCATED. They can't be told, "you can have sex, but don't worry about pregnancy, we'll abort if necessary".
That is a flagrant and abusive manner of treating ourselves and the way we live.
#39
Posted 09 August 2006 - 06:14 PM
#40
Posted 09 August 2006 - 06:15 PM
#41
Posted 09 August 2006 - 06:16 PM
#42
Posted 09 August 2006 - 06:18 PM
#45
Posted 11 August 2006 - 12:33 AM
#46
Posted 11 August 2006 - 02:50 AM
Only because im a guy and I dont know what its like to give birth to a child I dont want.
#47
Posted 11 August 2006 - 10:41 AM
#48
Posted 11 August 2006 - 11:10 AM
isaac2112, on Aug 11 2006, 02:33 AM, said:
isaac2112, on Aug 11 2006, 12:41 PM, said:
That's a point I agree with (though I still don't believe people should have sex irresponsibly, and I'd rather people didn't put the child up for adaption). It's truly unjustified to take a human life just for the mistake of the parents.
#50
Posted 11 August 2006 - 01:09 PM
I think that if a woman is sure she wants to get an abortion, good luck to her. I don't think anyone else has the right to tell her what she can and can't do.
Anyway, I believe abortion is legal over here (my friend had several when she was young), so, yeah. ^^
#52
Posted 11 August 2006 - 01:21 PM
Besides, it wasn't her choice to abort anyway... which sucks. >.<
#53
Posted 11 August 2006 - 01:22 PM
My girlfriend calls them fish nets. :P
#54
Posted 11 August 2006 - 01:28 PM
#56
Posted 11 August 2006 - 01:57 PM
But it's her choice.
#57
Posted 11 August 2006 - 04:08 PM
#63
Posted 12 August 2006 - 01:27 PM
Now, Bexie brings up a fair point. In many nations (i.e. especially in Africa), women are tortured and raped constantly. I saw a CNN doumentary about the crisis in Darfur, and it was absolutely sickening.
A woman raped for eight days straight? Her daughter, mutilated and literally torn? Another woman, who could no longer keep a straight posture?
And everyone of them, of course, gave birth, and now can't take care of the children, much less themselves.
#64
Posted 12 August 2006 - 01:40 PM
#65
Posted 12 August 2006 - 02:29 PM
#66
Posted 12 August 2006 - 02:33 PM
#67
Posted 12 August 2006 - 02:56 PM
#68
Posted 12 August 2006 - 03:21 PM
Platinum Sun, on Aug 12 2006, 04:33 PM, said:
isaac2112, on Aug 12 2006, 04:56 PM, said:
Just to remind you, I'm against abortion. As Isaac pointed before me, having sex irresponsibly doesn't justify murder. I agree with that on every notion.
It's only when I have to make a point about something more serious (i.e. the raped women of Darfur I mentioned) where my feelings get tested. Yes, I am still against abortion, no matter what, but even so, I'll feel bad for those women who are raped.
However, those women who choose to have an abortion for the sake of having one, and just because they can are the type I'll never agree with.
#69
Posted 13 August 2006 - 03:49 PM
But I don't think an unwanted child would be a happy child in adoption. You shouldn't have irresponsible sex, but abortion isn't right either.
#70
Posted 13 August 2006 - 08:09 PM
Tell me, what would you prefer; the chance to live life and be successful under adopted parents who will support you in the stead of the birthparents, or no chance at all to enter the world?
#71
Posted 22 August 2006 - 01:52 PM
#72
Posted 22 August 2006 - 02:03 PM
That being said, I don't quite know how I stand on abortion. I don't think it seems to be very wrong because I don't count the baby as alive at that stage. However, you are still killing its chances of life and hapiness. If somehow you got pregnant and it really wasn't your fault, I think you should be able to get an abortion. But if you just don't think you can cope with a baby and you want an abortion, I think adoption would be a better choice.
#73
Posted 22 August 2006 - 02:09 PM
Melbourne has always stood for the rights of homosexuals, abortionists, and other liberal ideas. Liberals are the truth!
#74
Posted 22 August 2006 - 03:00 PM
Anyway, I believe someone should be allowed to abort a child if she was raped or can't sustain the child. What's the point putting the child in the world with a default disadvantage? Or well, in a family it won't be allowed.
If someone atleast thought of aborting a child it obviously shows she cannot love... But then, many people regret it after, or was happy they didn't abort.
#75
Posted 05 January 2007 - 10:01 PM
Remember the rules. No flaming other members, no swearing, etc.
Carry on.
#76
Posted 05 January 2007 - 10:22 PM
It's not just the moral quandry over abortion that frustrates me. It's the legal stuff too. The reason that there's no federal laws regarding abortion is because Congress avoids that issue like typhoid. People kept bringing it up though, eventually it worked its way through the courts to the Supreme Court. It was a case called Roe V. Wade. (I'm impressed that it hasn't been mentioned yet.) The Supreme Court delivered an uncharacteristically indecisive verdict, stating that the regulation of abortion was the responsibility of state governments, further removing the federal government from the issue. I don't even think that the moral issue is really what this is all about. I have a very low opinion of humanity as a whole, but even I admit that there is only a tiny fraction of the population that is bothered by the knowledge that abortions are happening elsewhere in the country. What this is really about (like so many things) is money. Many states are spending tax dollars on running free abortion clinics and that's what's really raising support for the pro-life argument.
There. If that didn't make several people angry enough to reply, nothing will.
#77
Posted 06 January 2007 - 08:31 AM
#78
Posted 06 January 2007 - 08:54 AM
#79
Posted 06 January 2007 - 08:38 PM
#80
Posted 07 January 2007 - 02:17 PM
Having an abortion is (apparently) easy enough in the short term, but from what ive heard, it generally comes back to haunt the women who do it with guilt as they *do* end up feeling that they've killed their child.
#82
Posted 07 January 2007 - 08:56 PM
#83
Posted 08 January 2007 - 06:15 PM
#84
Posted 08 January 2007 - 08:15 PM
#85
Posted 08 January 2007 - 10:27 PM
Agatio, on Jan 8 2007, 09:15 PM, said:
...Interesting way of putting it. Still, you're right that reliance on simple evidence won't really amount to any ultimate conclusion.
By my opinion, I don't think abortions are really necessary. If someone wants an abortion, let the person have the abortion. However, instead of just killing the unborn child, why not just give him/her up for adoption? No killing necessary, and the child will probably have a chance to make something of himself/herself.
Some "mothers" want abortions instead of putting her child up for adoption because she doesn't want to think about how the child is doing. If anything, that's just absolutely pathetic. If you don't want a child, then you shouldn't have sex in the first place unless you use a condom. And even those aren't completely safe.
All in all, abortions are rather wrong, since it's just...dumb. It's really not useful.
#86
Posted 08 January 2007 - 11:04 PM
#87
Posted 09 January 2007 - 07:08 AM
Hotshot101, on Jan 9 2007, 04:04 PM, said:
Stop treating your opinion as fact, your ignorance is really starting to piss me off. Like I said, I don't value human life very highly, and I'm sure where there is one, there are more who think and feel the same. If you ever want to be taken seriously, take a step back and think about what you're posting before you post it. Saying something like "everyone values life" is a crock of ****, because I just said a mere 3 posts ago that I don't value human life very highly.
#88
Posted 09 January 2007 - 07:14 AM
#89
Posted 09 January 2007 - 07:28 AM
Hotshot101, on Jan 10 2007, 12:14 AM, said:
It's like conversing with a brick wall.
When I say I don't value life, I'm meaning that if an entire nation was wiped out, I probably wouldn't shed a tear, or I don't value life meaning that hearing about someone being raped or tortured really doesn't affect me in any emotional way. But when it comes down to it, I need to be realistic. I enjoy my life quite a lot at times; when I'm spending quality time with friends or listening to music in the solitude of my room.
But while I don't place a lot of value on human life, and while I'm nihilistic and quite a lot of the time misanthropic, I do need to be serious. We only get one shot at life, and according to my beliefs, once we die it's over, and I'm not ready to die just yet. So I intend to make the most of what time I do have. So yes, like I said, while life is essentially pointless to me (we live, we die, time continues), I do plan to make the most of what I have.
I suppose when you're wearing the blindfold of religion it's hard to get your head around someone else's ideology, but do me favour and try to understand.
#90
Posted 09 January 2007 - 07:37 AM
#91
Posted 09 January 2007 - 08:11 AM
Hotshot101, on Jan 10 2007, 12:37 AM, said:
Like I've said before, I like it when a topic strays from the original point. Of course some atheists value life, an atheist is something someone who doesn't have a religion, I guess you could say everyone is born an atheist and is one until they completely embrace a religion. In saying that, you can't really generalise at all with atheists, as all have their own beliefs or lack of beliefs.
Now, you're confusing valuing human life with caring about individual humans. I have quite a lot of people I care about, friends, family and whatnot, but that doesn't mean that I think these people's lives, or my own, are anything special, or worthwhile, or destined to anything but a casket six feet below the ground.
#92
Posted 09 January 2007 - 12:49 PM