Nintendo Versus Sony
#1
Posted 03 May 2005 - 10:50 PM
decide!" But I've made this so that people will [hopefully] debate on whether Sony, or Nintendo systems are better. I am fully aware of our other competitor, but they've pretty much only created one good system (Being our Xbox.)
Discuss.
#2
Posted 03 May 2005 - 11:10 PM
#4
Posted 03 May 2005 - 11:57 PM
#5
Posted 04 May 2005 - 12:00 AM
#6
Posted 04 May 2005 - 01:46 AM
Nah, I'm more of an Xbox fan (though I hate microsoft), but I prefer Nintendo over Sony. Nintendo has the classics, Sony only has the PSP going for it as far as I'm concerned.
#7
Posted 04 May 2005 - 03:16 AM
Agatio, on May 4 2005, 03:46 PM, said:
Ditto.
I can't wait for the PSP to be released here. Im getting it no-matter-what.
But ive heard alot of bad things about it. Are they true *looks for answers from Anubis*
This topic, in all its relevance, is strongly affected by bias. PS fans will go PS, and Nintendo fans etc.
(deliberate :P )
#8
Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:40 AM
If a console sucks, I believe it sucks, if a console is good, it's good. This topic is going to be exactly like the Next Generation topic, people are going to sit and debate about which consoles are gonna be better etc.
I mean look at it, there's a whole bunch of dumbass' that said the Revolution is going to be the best, you havn't even SEEN it yet you retards.
#11
Posted 04 May 2005 - 10:42 PM
#13
Posted 05 May 2005 - 08:20 AM
Thats it! his new nickname is 45. Period.
Anyway, Nintendo pisses all over sony. Sony is centralised on appliances like camera's, TV's etc. You don't see to many Nintendo brand TV's do you?
Exactly. Gaming is Nintendo's lifeforce.
To bad they suck compared to Sony.
*crowd is left confused and dazzled*
#14
Posted 05 May 2005 - 09:06 AM
#16
Posted 05 May 2005 - 08:24 PM
Agatio, on May 4 2005, 12:46 AM, said:
Oh yeah, I read somewhere that Playboy had plans for the PSP... but you guys try be gentlemen and stay away from that topic, eh? >.>; :P
Anyway, I used to be a Nintendo loyalist (or fanboy, who gives a damn) but now I'm starting to lean more on Sony, since they're the RPG-guys. :agitated: I just find RPGs so intriguing, I don't know! :P
C'mon guys, admit it, GameCube really wasn't that great of a console, the PS2 and Xbox totally pushed it aside, gave it a wedgie, and spat on it's shoe and left it their to cry. (metamorphically speaking, of course :angry:)
#17
Posted 05 May 2005 - 09:02 PM
#18
Posted 06 May 2005 - 03:26 PM
Colt the earth adept, on May 5 2005, 08:02 PM, said:
Well, what you say may be true but so far the PSP has ruled over the DS... seriously. Check all the gaming sites...
#19
Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:12 PM
#20
Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:54 PM
#21
Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:57 PM
But somehow, Sony and Microsoft seem to be beating them in the end. What's up with that? What's wrong with you, Nintendo? O.o;
#22
Posted 06 May 2005 - 06:05 PM
Here's the usual Nintendo games:
Zelda, Pokemon, Metriod and the characters that are in SSBM games with a few new series and a multiplatform...
That's why they are loosing.
#23
Posted 06 May 2005 - 06:35 PM
#24
Posted 06 May 2005 - 06:41 PM
Eugine, on May 6 2005, 05:05 PM, said:
Woah, woah, woah. Back it up? Are you insulting Metroid?!?!?!
I can just see Samus shooting the PSP into little peices. No offense though.
They do need more mature games though. Like RE4. That game rocks :P
#25
Posted 06 May 2005 - 06:44 PM
1) I already have a DVD player, and a CD player.
2) Like I said, I only want a gaming system. If I bought an Xbox I'd be spending more money than I really needed to because I'm partly buying a CD player and a DVD player.
It's easy to see where you're coming from, though. If a guy didn't have a DVD or a CD player, he'd be better off buying an Xbox; it's cheaper than buying everything individual.
That's a good point, Eugine. If Nintendo created a wider series and variety of games they wouldn't be sucking so much now.
Also look at how many Everyone rated (age 5+, if your country doesn't have ESRB ratings) games they have. Some people want to be 'mature' and would never buy an E rated game. :P
#26
Posted 06 May 2005 - 06:59 PM
Wind Dude, on May 6 2005, 05:44 PM, said:
Ya, but then they would be practiclly insulting the fun of a E rated game. Like....*picks up game freshly rented from Blockbuster* Mario Power Tennis. That game rocks socks to the......what rhymes with rocks & socks?
#27
Posted 06 May 2005 - 07:05 PM
#28
Posted 06 May 2005 - 07:44 PM
#29
Posted 06 May 2005 - 07:52 PM
#30
Posted 06 May 2005 - 07:57 PM
Agatio, on May 6 2005, 06:52 PM, said:
And a mod speaks.
Well, anywho. Who agress Samus (if real) could shatter the PSP?
And don't bring up Master Cheif. He signed his contract to Microsoft.
Nintendo does have more kid games then Sony, but who says they aren't good?
#31
Posted 06 May 2005 - 10:11 PM
#32
Posted 07 May 2005 - 09:24 AM
Quote
You totally missed what I said. Are you really reading what I'm saying?
Okay, what I was trying to say:
"Some people (namely kids around my age, 12-14) would never buy/rent and E rated game. Rather, they would play all the M rated games. :P Who would they go to to satisfy their bloodlust? Most likely the Xbox. They have shiatloads of M rated games. This would be an advantage, as opposed to Nintendo."
Of course that can be a disadvantage to Xbox, but so far the ratio of M rated games seems to be doing them good. Just goes to show you what people go for. =/
#33
Posted 07 May 2005 - 11:49 AM
#34
Posted 07 May 2005 - 02:55 PM
EDIT: I'd play star fox because you get to fly around and shoot things down, play with 4 people, kill the 4, and I liek it because I have never lost once!!!! I may hav ebeen shot down but I have always won teh whole thing mwhuahahah!
#35
Posted 07 May 2005 - 03:55 PM
Colt the earth adept, on May 7 2005, 01:55 PM, said:
Actually, alot of parents don't care anymore... Either that, or they don't know about age ratings in games. =/
#36
Posted 07 May 2005 - 04:10 PM
#37
Posted 07 May 2005 - 11:57 PM