Earth's Ozone Layer ...
#1
Posted 05 May 2005 - 09:25 PM
The Ozone Layer is a thin, but vital area of the Earth's atmosphere. It is where the harmful rays of the Sun are filtered out. Without it, the Earth would probably have a hostile enviroment for life.
What is happening to it?
Due to uses of a group of gas substances called chlorofluorocarborns (or CFCs), burning of fossil fuels, and burning of rain forests, the Ozone layer is being destroyed. In 1985, a lack of Ozone was discovered in Antartica. This is known as the "Ozone Hole". Not long after, another lack of ozone was found over the Arctic, but it is not nearly as bad as the one over Antartica. The following image is proof:
http://www.visionengineer.com/env/ozone_layer.jpg
This was the status of the Ozone Layer in 1997.
This is very bad. What do you think of it?
(I found this out in a book, I just took the image from a result in Google Image search)
#2
Posted 05 May 2005 - 09:40 PM
That just goes to show how much we care about the planet.
Ah, Futurama Ozone refrence.
Prof. (I think): "What is this layer of Ozone? It was never here before."
#3
Posted 05 May 2005 - 11:44 PM
#4
Posted 06 May 2005 - 03:05 AM
Puh. Not very good here at all. The only rain we get is from cyclones.
I love cyclones :P
Stupid Ozone.
We should start making ozone ya' know.
you see: Normal oxygen is usually O2. Ozone however is O3. I think it can be artifiaclly produced, but goddam, it's freakin' expensive...
#5
Posted 06 May 2005 - 09:31 AM
It's just that we destroy it quicker than it is made. :P
#6
Posted 06 May 2005 - 03:13 PM
Agatio, on May 6 2005, 12:44 AM, said:
The hole isn't where you are. Its in Antartica, to the south of where you live, though Australia is getting kinda close to the "Ozone Hole" as it grows. And it doesn't mean hotter summers. It means that people will be vulnerable to far more dangerous radiation if they live under an area with a lack of Ozone. The Greenhouse Effect is what causes Earth to be hotter.
lifeform287, on May 5 2005, 10:40 PM, said:
Actually, it was always there, it was just the damage to it that was not known until 1985.
Anyway, I do think that we have to find another type of oil for cars oither than Fossil Fuel Oil. It may cause some economic problems, but it could be worth it. Unfortunately, in the United States (the country that burns the most fossil fuels by far), Bush is too stubborn about oil to make that change, which is one reason I don't like him. (no offence to Bush supporters)
#7
Posted 06 May 2005 - 03:49 PM
just had to clear that up...
Anyways, this destruction of the ozone layer has been going on since the 1800's. If you want to do something about it just search on google; all the continents seem to have their own pages for it.
Its taken you all long enough to realize the ozone layer is dying; do something about it. We Pagans can't do it all, even with the help of the environmentalists... everyone sees us as radicals, but when they die from radiation or the greenhouse effect, oh I will just be laughing sooo hard... we all will be dying while worrying about oil prices and terrorists... so do something!! Tycho out.
#8
Posted 06 May 2005 - 04:04 PM
But yeah, thats the problem about this Colonal Tycho, but you know, there are some idiotic people who care more about themselves and/or their job with oil than anything else, including the enviroment. :P
#9
Posted 06 May 2005 - 04:35 PM
Ozone is really dangerous to the human body. It can cause a person to spontaneously combust, turning to just so much ash in a matter of seconds. If it were to be artificially produced, it would have to be carefully monitored.
The real problem is CFCs. Chlorofluorocarbons are used in fridges, aerosol cans and even fire extinguishers. They float from the surface up into atmosphere, where UV rays break them down into chlorine. That just eats up the oxygen in the ozone layer. Just one atom of chlorine can take out 100 000 oxygen atoms, seperating them and spreading them away.
We learned that matter is never destroyed, it's just displaced. So all the oxygen is still going somewhere.
Yup, there's an entire days learning of grade nine science. :P
#10
Posted 06 May 2005 - 04:46 PM
The benefits of CFCs simply outweigh the environmental damages so us humans will not be stop using it anytime soon. We all use CFCs so we ALL are responsible for the ozone depletion.
Why is the ozone lair not recovering?
Simply because it is a norm for us to depend on the uses of CFCs...
#11
Posted 06 May 2005 - 04:52 PM
Gimli the Great, on May 6 2005, 02:13 PM, said:
Anyway, I do think that we have to find another type of oil for cars oither than Fossil Fuel Oil. It may cause some economic problems, but it could be worth it. Unfortunately, in the United States (the country that burns the most fossil fuels by far), Bush is too stubborn about oil to make that change, which is one reason I don't like him. (no offence to Bush supporters)
Ok, If you knew abit of the Profs. backround he is 160 years old, meaning the Ozone probably faded before he was born. I'd say about....2300-2500. In that area since it seems to be going slow. But that's just a show.
#12
Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:09 PM
#13
Posted 06 May 2005 - 05:54 PM
Wong. Over the years, we’ve got huge amounts of green plants and especially carbon dioxide-breathing plankton and algae on our planet, courtesy to the greenhouse effect. If we suddenly stop producing greenhouse gases, these plants and algae will suck up all carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. All these have been made to try and counter the massive amounts of CD in the world and to strike up a balance. So, when we stop making CD, there will be much more things to redice CD than we need, and they will mercilessly eat it all up.
This will kickstart an instant, all-out Ice Age, as our planet is robbed from its protective carbon dioxide ‘coat’. The Earth would freeze over. It would turn into a huge snowball.
Now, who wants to have an Ice Age without any heating to keep us warm?
Sounds fun? Yep... and this is going to happen in our lifetimes too! Yay for the oil crisis O.o
#14
Posted 06 May 2005 - 09:56 PM
Here's a very interesting article. http://www.csmonitor...01s02-ussc.html
#15
Posted 06 May 2005 - 11:46 PM
Golden Djinn13, on May 6 2005, 04:09 PM, said:
yeah, when i was younger i was never concerned about the ozone layer, i always thought it wouldnt be a big problem
but now im starting to realize how serious its going to effect everybody if the holes get bigger. I live in Prince george (BC, canada) and i noticed its hotter than it usually is this time of year
#16
Posted 06 May 2005 - 11:55 PM
I've known of this ... forever.
Meh.
#17
Posted 06 May 2005 - 11:56 PM
http://www.nasa.gov/images/content/66825main1_ozone0262_t.jpg
The opening looks like South America, but upside down.
I have seen weird things but that bites the cake.
I found some more pics.
http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/image/991...03_toms_big.jpg
This one was taken.....tommorrow? Riiiiiight.....
http://www.temis.nl/protocols/o3field/data/forecast/today_sp.gif
Edit: Ooops I'll just put the link.
#18
Posted 07 May 2005 - 12:01 AM
Piers diamondberg master, on May 7 2005, 12:55 AM, said:
I've known it for a long time too, I just didnt post it until now because I forgot about it until I read a book.
But, the last image could be a sign of Ozone improvement, unless there was an error with the sattelite (BTW, the image was taken at the time stated; its probably because its already May 7 where the pic was sent back due to the time zone).
EDIT: I found an interesting article that states the reason why there is so much ozone damage in Antartica.
http://science.nasa..../ast02oct_1.htm
This post has been edited by Gimli the Great: 07 May 2005 - 01:32 AM
#19
Posted 08 May 2005 - 05:09 AM
Eugine, on May 6 2005, 11:31 PM, said:
bingo!
How could I forget that...?
I DID know it was made by UV radiation. But merely... forgot.. yes ;)
Seriously though, I did know that.
"It's just that we destroy it quicker than it is made."
Damn city people and there millions of cars...
#20
Posted 08 May 2005 - 10:48 AM
ZING!
Anyway, people bring it upon themselves. Huge cities with stacks of air pollution are bringing down the ozone layer. I'm not a fan of greenies, but this is one thing that is a real concern. Ah well, I'll be dead before it becomes a real threat ;) .
#21
Posted 08 May 2005 - 04:36 PM
#23
Posted 08 May 2005 - 08:03 PM
#24
Posted 08 May 2005 - 08:35 PM
#25
Posted 08 May 2005 - 10:03 PM
Besides, if you're sad you're not going to see it in your lifetime, you get the oil crisis to look forward too! YAY!
...
Ain't life a pisser?
#26
Posted 09 May 2005 - 07:55 AM
Agatio, on May 9 2005, 12:48 AM, said:
Not you too... ;)
I'll say this once more: *clears throat*
I do NOT live on a farm. Cool?
ok..
See the bold? I agree with that.
#27
Posted 09 May 2005 - 03:35 PM
I also found something out: The Ozone over the Arctic isn't in very good shape either.
Well, not as bad as it is in Anartica, but...
http://www.gsfc.nasa.gov/gsfc/earth/pictures/2001/0222earth/ozone.jpg
#28
Posted 15 May 2005 - 04:47 PM
Memories Remain, on May 9 2005, 06:55 AM, said:
Why don't you just make a banner that says that and put it in your sig?
It's not too bad here in Langley [to self]I'm just waitin for someone to ask where that is......[/to self] but it is coming over from Vancouver. [to self] At least people know where that is.....[/to self]
#29
Posted 15 May 2005 - 05:10 PM
#30
Posted 15 May 2005 - 05:35 PM
#31
Posted 15 May 2005 - 07:19 PM
Piers diamondberg master, on May 6 2005, 10:55 PM, said:
Same here. Known it since I was like, 5, maybe even before that.
Anyways, the ozone supposedly is healing itself, but that doesn't mean we can just rest... if we do we'll just damage it more before it can heal. =/
But you know, I find the answer to all of lifes little problems is to simply not live at all. :P [/pessimist view]
#32
Posted 15 May 2005 - 07:23 PM
We are damaging the Ozone faster, correction, MUCH faster, then it can heal itself, so I don't see it being fully repaired in the near future.
#33
Posted 15 May 2005 - 11:23 PM
#34
Posted 16 May 2005 - 04:48 PM
Agatio, on May 15 2005, 10:23 PM, said:
Oh, thanks for the cheery info......
I already blame the past for stuff, so I know how they will/would/shall? feel.
Speaking of the past....my great-great grandmother (Not sure how many greats) was supposed to be on the Titanic. But her husbund got the flu so she stayed home. And that is why I like getting the flu.
#35
Posted 17 May 2005 - 12:11 AM
Quote
^ Probably the most random & irrelevent thing ever posted on GSSF. Be proud.