Dumbledore Is ***!
#3
Posted 20 October 2007 - 08:25 AM
Quote
:(
I always felt he was a little too close to Harry...
Seriously though it's a strange thing to say after the release. Why not just put it in the book?
#4
Posted 20 October 2007 - 08:33 AM
#5
Posted 20 October 2007 - 01:15 PM
#6
Posted 20 October 2007 - 01:42 PM
#7
Posted 20 October 2007 - 01:45 PM
#8
Posted 20 October 2007 - 01:47 PM
#9
Posted 20 October 2007 - 01:48 PM
Wind Dude, on Oct 20 2007, 03:47 PM, said:
Exactly my thoughts on it.
#10
Posted 20 October 2007 - 02:13 PM
Wind Dude, on Oct 20 2007, 09:47 PM, said:
Same here. I have nothing against him being ***, but he kinda loses his mysteriousness. I thought he was like Voldemort in that having a lover was much less important then his ultimate goal.
#12
Posted 20 October 2007 - 04:20 PM
Dumbledore will lose many 'respect' he once had. And I'm pissed.
From digg alone:
"So thats why they call him the "head master" at hogwards"
"Don't worry, Albus, I'm sure everyone will be behind you... oh, wait."
"When is she gonna reveal the whole series is ***?"
"I have other means by which I can make myself invisible" - Dumbledore
Oh my."
#13
Posted 21 October 2007 - 05:00 AM
#14
Posted 21 October 2007 - 12:01 PM
#15
Posted 21 October 2007 - 12:04 PM
.eugine, on Oct 20 2007, 11:20 PM, said:
Sorry but that did make me laugh. :(
It is a pointless move and I really don't understand why she's done it. It means that the reader can't use as much imagination in the story as they would do otherwise.
#16
Posted 21 October 2007 - 12:53 PM
I don't think this should change the way people had viewed Dumbledore. At least not dramatically. What would happen if Rowling has said that he was in love with McGonagall instead of saying this? Would that change people's image of him?
#17
Posted 21 October 2007 - 01:58 PM
#19
Posted 21 October 2007 - 08:51 PM
I just assumed at the time that she never thought about giving Dumbledore any relationship or love stories, since that would lessen the image of his infallible strength and power.
#20
Posted 21 October 2007 - 08:56 PM
#21
Posted 21 October 2007 - 09:15 PM
Revealing this was just a waste! Now people who never read the books will have a different opinion we Dumbledore fans had while reading.
"omgz, he likes Harry"
#22
Posted 22 October 2007 - 04:26 AM
That seriously slightly ruins the series.
#23
Posted 22 October 2007 - 11:26 AM
.eugine, on Oct 22 2007, 05:15 AM, said:
Actually, I think you might be right. It's strange how she never mentioned even one of Dumbledore's love interests in the books though...
#24
Posted 22 October 2007 - 01:08 PM
What about the harry potter newbies who have only just started reading. What would you say about reccommending the books to them? ' Oh yeah, it's a cool book about Wizards. And the headmaster is ***'. It's not going to sound as cool as ' Oh yeah, it's a cool book about wizards. And the headmaster is a mysterious and powerful wizard. Stereotypes being what they are today, people will automatically assume that the headmaster talks loudly, wears eccentric clothing and is very flamboyant, instead of what he actually is.
#25
Posted 22 October 2007 - 04:55 PM
#27
Posted 22 October 2007 - 07:05 PM
Platinum Sun, on Oct 22 2007, 06:55 PM, said:
Well, that's exactly it. I always just thought that was a quirky "Dumbledore thing" not a "*** thing".
#28
Posted 23 October 2007 - 12:24 PM
#30
Posted 23 October 2007 - 03:09 PM
#31
Posted 23 October 2007 - 05:44 PM
#33
Posted 24 October 2007 - 12:12 PM
#34
Posted 25 October 2007 - 04:27 AM
Once, after playing Oscar Wilde, a young journalist came up to him and asked him if he found it hard to play a homosexual.
The actor, Michael Gambon, replied: "No, I didn't find it hard, because I used to be one. However I had to give it up because it made my eyes water."
Of course, the young journalist is frantically scribbling this down because he thinks hes got an exclusive scoop.
#35
Posted 25 October 2007 - 05:32 AM