[Nosferatu]

http://homepage.mac.com/dezro/Serious%20Cat.jpg
Serious cat deems it so.

[Someone Else]

ORLY?

[Golden Legacy]

Let's talk about the conundrums the mechanics of quantum theory poses when an objective subject enters a subjective perspective with the removed reference of position in question deemed altered by physical passage yet subconscious intent.

Seriously.

[kate]

The last part of that sentence kind of fell apart, but good job snookums.

[Toasty]

Golden Legacy, on Aug 23 2008, 10:32 PM, said:

Let's talk about the conundrums the mechanics of quantum theory poses when an objective subject enters a subjective perspective with the removed reference of position in question deemed altered by physical passage yet subconscious intent.

Seriously.

I prefer the views of general relativity over quantum mechanics. For the most part at least.

Did you know that using qubits in a quantum computer instead of bits in a conventional computer, that we can store and send multiple values in a single 'bit'? Intead of just a 1 or a 0 in a conventional bit, we can now send either 1's, 0's, or both at the same time.

[kate]

this is hawt. quick snookums, say something fancy about math

[Joek2]

........NERD FIGHT!!!!

*runs into church*

NERD FIGHT!!!!

*runs into school*

NERD FIGHT!!!!!



persun hu getz refrence getz cookey

[Kuchiyose]

Actus reus of secondary participation.

Attorney General reference (1975 when introduced into the English legal system).

D, who knew that a friend was going to drive home, laced his non-alcoholic drink with alcohol. When the friend was charged with driving while over the limit for alcohol (s 6(1) road traffic act 1972, D was charged with aiding, absetting, counselling and procuring that offence. The trial judge ruled that there were no case to answer to as there was no meeting of minds, hence the three areas reasoned for this was:

1: Each of the words: aid, abet, counsel and procure has different meaning.
2: To precure means to produce by endeavour.
3: There must be a casual link between the precuring and the commission of the offence.

Lord Widgery opinion on the case was that: 1 "we approachs 8 of the accessories and abettors act of 1861 on the basis that the words should be given their ordinary meaning referring the literal rule). "We approach the section on the basis also that if four words are employed here 'aid, abet, counsel or procure' the probability is that there is a difference between each of those four words and the other three, because if there was no such difference, then Parliament would be wasting time in using four words when two or three would do.

Also

To procure means to produce by endeavour.
You produce and see it happen and take the correct steps to see the produce happen.

And one more quote from lordy here:

"Causation here is important. You cannot procute an offence unless there is a causal link between what you do and the commission of the offence"

A fun little criminal law case to learn xD My god remembering took a while xD

[Someone Else]

ಠ_ಠ

[Toasty]

I concur.

[Kuchiyose]

too serious, ja?

[Blue]

<_<

[Kuchiyose]

<_<