Terrorist Attack London
#1
Posted 07 July 2005 - 05:21 AM
Heads are gonna roll for this shiz.
#2
Posted 07 July 2005 - 09:57 AM
1. The British public to use this as a reason to pull out of Iraq
2. The British public to decide it's for their own good to support the Iraq War
#3
Posted 07 July 2005 - 10:04 AM
And the latest news is that the European part of Al-Quida are the assasinators. they have claimed the attack in London.
#4
Posted 07 July 2005 - 10:10 AM
Stay safe, Londoners. :agitated:
#5
Posted 07 July 2005 - 10:13 AM
#6
Posted 07 July 2005 - 02:06 PM
#7
Posted 07 July 2005 - 02:13 PM
#8
Posted 07 July 2005 - 03:22 PM
It's pretty scary.
I'm scared that something like that will happen to The Netherlands.
#9
Posted 07 July 2005 - 03:27 PM
The terrorist only attacked the stations luckly. There are only 37 deaths, Im very sorty that those people died but it could be MUCH worse I think...
#10
Posted 07 July 2005 - 03:28 PM
I think they are going to attack the country's that helped America.
#11
Posted 07 July 2005 - 04:21 PM
I don't think they'll attack countries like The Netherlands and Belgium...
#12
Posted 07 July 2005 - 04:22 PM
#14
Posted 07 July 2005 - 04:32 PM
"Terrorists will fail no matter what," Blair reiterated. He sounds just like our President Bush.
#15
Posted 07 July 2005 - 05:24 PM
Fight fire with fire, if they are attacking innocent civilians with hit and run tactics because they believe it is right. Then we can go send some pimped out stealth bombers to hit and run their countries because we believe that's also right.
It's just like a virus, you have to remove ALL of it. You can't just delete some of it and leave the rest, otherwise it will come back, and again, and again. If you kill a terrorist, a new one is trained, if you take out the training camp, a new one is made somewhere else, if you wipe out the faction, a new one is created soon after.
#16
Posted 07 July 2005 - 05:26 PM
#17
Posted 07 July 2005 - 05:52 PM
That's what happened to the double decker bus after a terrorist blew up the second floor that was packed with people. The roof literally blew 3 metres in the air and then pieces of it was raining down all over the place. The bus was completely packed with people trying to escape back home from the previous explosions. Such cowardly tactics is commonly used by people who have no honor or dignity. So to fight and bomb us for the honor and dignity of their religion is a ridiculous excuse in its own right.
#18
Posted 07 July 2005 - 05:54 PM
Anubis, on Jul 7 2005, 03:52 PM, said:
That's what happened to the double decker bus after a terrorist blew up the second floor that was packed with people. The roof literally blew 3 metres in the air and then pieces of it was raining down all over the place. The bus was completely packed with people trying to escape back home from the previous explosions. Such cowardly tactics is commonly used by people who have no honor or dignity. So to fight and bomb us for the honor and dignity of their religion is a ridiculous excuse in its own right.
I saw that pic.
That just shows how idiotic these Al-Qeada freaks are. >>
#19
Posted 07 July 2005 - 06:02 PM
The people say no war, the people say no terrorism, the people say alot of shiz. Sometimes to get peace you must spill blood, sometimes to get peace you must not. Let us take a look back at history, some religions have many Gods that battled eachother on many occassions. So why is it wrong when we must fight? It's kill or be killed, so we should take action and wipe out the threat before they make their next move.
Imagine if they ever get a hold of a nuke and manage to blow it up in a city. Don't think it's not possible, people thought hijacking planes and smashing them into buildings wasn't possible either. If they ever blow a nuke up in a city then the public will be moaning about how the government should have stopped it. The public always complains no matter what. It's like locking me into a high security prison and then demmanding that I break free, and when I break free demmanding that I sneak back in.
If I was the Prime Minister, I would launch so many SCUD missiles on Afghanistan that they would think it was God himself raining down terror on them. Sometimes you must not be forgiving for the greater good.
#20
Posted 07 July 2005 - 06:11 PM
The bombing must have been planned before hand regardless if London won the vote or not. Names are shooting up about which group is responsible for the attack but nothing can be back up at this point. Lets hope friends and family are ok down there.
#21
Posted 07 July 2005 - 06:13 PM
1) Who would give you the right to do that? Wiping them out sounds like a solution but... that will make even more people complain at you.
2) Wouldn't that cause more war instead of peace?
#22
Posted 07 July 2005 - 07:24 PM
Sheba, on Jul 8 2005, 12:13 AM, said:
1) Well I said if I had the power that's what I'd do.
2) Take out your opponent swiftly and it will show other countries what you are capable of doing if it ever comes down to it. If you destroy Iraq or Afghanistan, do you think the terrorists would be willing to risk everything they are fighting for? If your country is wiped out, you have lost no matter what. Just like the Hiroshima bomb, when they dropped that baby Japan surrendered and everyone else was like "shiz, I ain't Forking with America, those guys have atomic bombs and shiz". Fear is also a way of keeping the peace.
#23
Posted 07 July 2005 - 07:43 PM
You can't fight fire with fire. Sometimes water IS the best solution - you simply need enough of it (the water being international resolve and support).
There wouldn't be a need to "wipe out" the Mid East (in some peoples minds) if the so-called "international coalition" actually existed.
#24
Posted 07 July 2005 - 07:46 PM
#25
Posted 07 July 2005 - 07:50 PM
????????????????????
I'm saying that there needs to be much more international support, not the US or UK launching a nuke. It would be more effective to send in more troops to smoke out terrorists SPECIFICALLY, rather than being indifferent and launching a nuke at a crap load of innocents.
#26
Posted 07 July 2005 - 07:53 PM
#27
Posted 08 July 2005 - 01:43 AM
In war, every death counts. We're in the 21's century, technological warfare is safer, quicker, easier and better than just sending a thousands troops and having a 2year long battle. I'm not saying NUKE them, I'm saying send a couple thousands ballistic missiles down there to show who is boss.
Their morale is high, they switch on the TV to see that they are all over international news and they say to eachother "Haha, we did that yo! We're on the news worldwide cause we bomb the Fork out of America and London and Spain!".
It's not a case of wiping out the leader, why do you think people are still fighting in Iraq even though Saddam has been caught and humiliated? It's common knowledge, assholes attract assholes. You get rid of an asshole and another asshole will replace him. Take out the problem from the root and destroy every asshole so there are no assholes left to take their place.
#28
Posted 08 July 2005 - 01:46 AM
Agatio, on Jul 8 2005, 11:53 AM, said:
You hit the nail on the head.
They're hitting countries fighting terriosm, America, A big Australian tourist spot in Bail, England.
I don't know what the best course of action is, terroism needs to be stopped but nuking a whole country is idicotic Anubis, i know how you feel. My brother is over there and i thought of him as soon as i heard about it. But beating the crap out of a country isn't the right thing to do.
#29
Posted 08 July 2005 - 01:50 AM
#30
Posted 08 July 2005 - 03:46 AM
#31
Posted 08 July 2005 - 05:33 AM
Fork taking prisoners, just shoot anyone who is holding anything that can be used or mistaken as a weapon.
#32
Posted 08 July 2005 - 07:43 AM
"OmgwtfAnubis"
thank goodness your alive :')
>___>
what has this world come to?
I'm sorta behind a bit, but what's the reason for all this?
<___<
:agitated: purhaps 2012 a heh
#33
Posted 08 July 2005 - 07:53 AM
#34
Posted 08 July 2005 - 08:14 AM
It's not as if they come on guns blazing so you have a chance to run for your life, no. They look just like anyone else, they dress just like anyone else, they walk next to you, they whistle as if they are having a great day, then they reach into their jacket, push that button and boom, their balls have just been launched into the neighbouring street along with various other body parts.
A cowardly and dishonorable way of fighting. The easiest way to describe this is simple. Terrorists are like those little kids who throw stuff at you and hide behind their parents when you are gonna beat them up for it. Everytime you give up they throw something again and repeat the process.
#35
Posted 08 July 2005 - 09:13 AM
You don't realize how insufficient the number of troops are in Iraq, do you? You'd be surprised how much easier things would be with some extra fighters, which means more money to share, which means more supplies, which means more safety, and so on and so forth.
There's no need for a friggin' ballistic missile if you have enough troops to overwhelm people. There have been few deaths among the US forces during the Iraq war. It seems like a lot (1000 I believe), but we've been there for almost 3 years. Other major wars we've been in have seen 10000s more after only a couple of years.
Give the soldiers what they need and they can get the job done - no one is willing to believe that though.
#36
Posted 08 July 2005 - 09:28 AM
#37
Posted 08 July 2005 - 09:37 AM
It's weird how these things go on in Iraq so often and so little is done. But when our country is attacked it is world news.
I certainly hope that this is last we hear from the terrorists but I really doubt that it is.
#38
Posted 08 July 2005 - 10:32 AM
DiddyKong, on Jul 7 2005, 09:27 PM, said:
You got yourself pretty wrong there, DK.
The Netherlands are quite pro-american. In this country we have a lot of Muslims, but the respect they have here is very low. Muslims don't have that much rights in this country, and they know that. there is a change we will come soon.
#39
Posted 08 July 2005 - 11:20 AM
I agree with Andross, you can't jsut go in and attack rashly, like bombing them. IT would probably be a waste, cuz then we'd have people hating us for it.
Anyways, we(the USA) have had deaths in Iraq, and many injuries. You don't ever here about those helicopters being shot down? And I am worried, I got cousins going in and out of Iraq.
Anyways, Like I said, there's NO WAY to prevent a terrorist attack, you can lower your chances, but they will always have a chance themselves. I heard that from Terrorist Expert Uda something... Some dude from Germany on the news.
#40
Posted 08 July 2005 - 11:50 AM
#41
Posted 08 July 2005 - 01:12 PM
DiddyKong, on Jul 7 2005, 02:27 PM, said:
37 is actually alot, though there were alot more dead in thr Twin Towers affair.
God... thinking of those towers crumbling down now... it's giving me the creeps. *plays Hordes of Underdark music* It's fits the mood.
I hope that Britian don't think we're dumbasses now. :agitated: It all technically goes back to the United States', so we're really the ones at fault here.
Quote
By the way though, I think the terrorist attack was most likely a message to Britian to "Get the hell out of Iraq and Afghanistan." so, depending on what Prime Minister Toni Blair wants...
#42
Posted 08 July 2005 - 01:25 PM
#43
Posted 08 July 2005 - 01:29 PM
#44
Posted 08 July 2005 - 01:31 PM
Sometimes the most direct approach is the best, and this is one of those times.
#45
Posted 08 July 2005 - 01:40 PM
#46
Posted 08 July 2005 - 06:07 PM
Agatio, on Jul 8 2005, 09:28 AM, said:
No, really? I coulda sworn they teleported a bomb onto those rails to blow up the Underground! *sigh*
Agatio, there's always a source, and if you kill the source, you kill the virus. Iraq has become a source because of Bush, unfortunately, but it's still a source nonetheless. If Iraq is left alone, you're better off using a solar sail to hitch a ride to another galaxy, because then the virus will never die.
I also see no rhyme to your reason - didn't you just say we should wipe out the Mid East by carpet bombing the place? But then you just said that bombing Iraq would solve nothing, and it's not only the mid east. Consistency please.
I think you're missing my more general statement, nonetheless - the international community needs to work together. If the US could get the French, Canadians, Australians, Italians, Chinese, Dutch, Swiss - all of these other major countries on board, we would get this "war on terror" crap over with a lot faster.
#47
Posted 09 July 2005 - 07:31 PM
#48
Posted 09 July 2005 - 07:35 PM
Andross, on Jul 9 2005, 10:07 AM, said:
Agatio, there's always a source, and if you kill the source, you kill the virus. Iraq has become a source because of Bush, unfortunately, but it's still a source nonetheless. If Iraq is left alone, you're better off using a solar sail to hitch a ride to another galaxy, because then the virus will never die.
I also see no rhyme to your reason - didn't you just say we should wipe out the Mid East by carpet bombing the place? But then you just said that bombing Iraq would solve nothing, and it's not only the mid east. Consistency please.
I think you're missing my more general statement, nonetheless - the international community needs to work together. If the US could get the French, Canadians, Australians, Italians, Chinese, Dutch, Swiss - all of these other major countries on board, we would get this "war on terror" crap over with a lot faster.
I was just kidding when I said to carpet bomb it. It would be good I admit, because I'd love to wipe the smirk of those fantatics faces by wiping out millions of their civilians, but like I also said, it won't stop the problem, or virus as you call it. The reason a lot of other countries are staying out is because they think they can avoid becoming a target, and I don't blame them, but the right thing to do would be to band together.
#49
Posted 09 July 2005 - 07:43 PM
Andross, on Jul 8 2005, 07:07 PM, said:
Agatio, there's always a source, and if you kill the source, you kill the virus. Iraq has become a source because of Bush, unfortunately, but it's still a source nonetheless. If Iraq is left alone, you're better off using a solar sail to hitch a ride to another galaxy, because then the virus will never die.
I also see no rhyme to your reason - didn't you just say we should wipe out the Mid East by carpet bombing the place? But then you just said that bombing Iraq would solve nothing, and it's not only the mid east. Consistency please.
I think you're missing my more general statement, nonetheless - the international community needs to work together. If the US could get the French, Canadians, Australians, Italians, Chinese, Dutch, Swiss - all of these other major countries on board, we would get this "war on terror" crap over with a lot faster.
Like Agatio said, many of those countries that you named may not want to join now, because of fear of becoming a target for attacks, even though it would be best for them to join forces and end this whole thing.
#50
Posted 09 July 2005 - 07:54 PM
#51
Posted 09 July 2005 - 07:58 PM
#52
Posted 09 July 2005 - 07:59 PM
Terrorists want less countries to oppose them, but those terrorists jump at the chance to kill them anyways. It's sad, but it's the tuth. Terrorists are a bunch of winers. Even Islamic followers think that the Islamic terrorists are freaks, and have no reason to kill civilians, and killing those civilians is not allowed through the Quran.
#53
Posted 09 July 2005 - 09:04 PM
#54
Posted 09 July 2005 - 10:07 PM
Agatio, on Jul 9 2005, 07:58 PM, said:
So because we can't eliminate the whole problem, we shouldn't even try and lessen its effects? The reason more terrorists pop up is because of the head honchos who spew all that propaganda, as well as some lower sections, but terrorists do start off as kids, so it's not like they can pop-up forever, because some generation is going to see the contradictions in Islamic terrorism.
While we probably won't wipe terrorism off the face of the planet, that doesn't mean we can't weaken it to a point where the world can move on and do other stuff, like research energy alternatives.
And on a sidenote: Anyone notice how NOT ONE SINGLE ISLAMIC LEADER has spoken out against the terrorist strike in London? The other reason terrorists keep getting bred is because the higher ups ARE the source of a lot of terrorism. But NOOOO, the US has too much invested in Saudi Arabia and vice versa *rolls eyes*
#55
Posted 09 July 2005 - 10:09 PM
#56
Posted 09 July 2005 - 11:14 PM
Quote
The "leaders" of Islam did, or their priests, what ever they are called. The believe that killing innocent civilians is not acceptable by the Quran.
#57
Posted 10 July 2005 - 01:28 AM
#58
Posted 10 July 2005 - 05:05 AM
So basically, belive it or not, this all started because a dumbass misread something! :rolleyes:
#59
Posted 10 July 2005 - 03:29 PM
Anubis, on Apr 13 2004, 10:46 PM, said:
Just had to post that :rolleyes:
Anyways, I got family in London, they called ASAP and said everything was alright. WOW! The relief.
#60
Posted 10 July 2005 - 09:53 PM
Izar, on Jul 9 2005, 11:14 PM, said:
Forgot to reply - I thank it's mams? Something with an 'm', but I'm talking about the more higher ups, such as Saudi Arabian officials, leaders of other Arab countries, or even more prominent Arab leaders. I don't think there's been one that has denounced the attacks. They might not condone 'em, but I find it a bit rude that there hasn't been any official announcments from such countries.
#61
Posted 11 July 2005 - 01:59 AM
#62
Posted 11 July 2005 - 10:33 AM
#63
Posted 11 July 2005 - 04:32 PM
#64
Posted 13 July 2005 - 10:37 AM
#65
Posted 17 July 2005 - 08:29 AM
Echo_djinn, on Jul 11 2005, 05:32 PM, said:
Darn it i hoped canada would be safe :lol: But there wouldn't be tragedy if something good didn't come out of it
#66
Posted 21 July 2005 - 04:50 PM
#67
Posted 21 July 2005 - 04:58 PM
#68
Posted 21 July 2005 - 11:34 PM
#69
Posted 22 July 2005 - 02:28 AM
Wild Fox, on Jul 22 2005, 12:34 AM, said:
No its not really, its one of the most multi cultural areas in the world. They are making a statement that no one is their ally and that no one is safe. Just because your not american doesnt mean you wont get attacked. Many of my clan members are british, so I hear alot of how they feel over there and well, as you can guess they are pissed right the hell off lol. I couldnt even understand what Shadow was saying when the first bombings happened he was yelling and so angry...the terrorists have made a mistake. Never, EVER piss off a brit...and they pissed off alot of brits.
#70
Posted 22 July 2005 - 02:51 AM
#71
Posted 22 July 2005 - 04:49 AM
Still though, i hope they give it up soon...maybe if we did what they wanted and left Iraq it would save a hellova lot of lives on both sides. I mean...why are we still there anyways? What will happen is that the terrorists will keep this up and we wont be able to leave Iraq because if we do it will look like we gave into the terrorists even if our reasons were that we didn't need to be there.
So therefore, we're stuck in that hell hole until someone in the government finaly swallows thier pride (and that of the rest of the country) and lets them win. I don't want to see my family blown up just to say "we were strong and didn't back down from the terrorists". I would rather they were all alive and im sure more people would feel the same way, especially those who HAVE lost someone already.
#72
Posted 22 July 2005 - 08:15 AM
#73
Posted 22 July 2005 - 08:42 AM
#74
Posted 22 July 2005 - 02:17 PM
Anyways i heard that police were chasing another suicide bomber this morning, he tripped and they dived on him. Then they shot him 5 times and killed him. That's kinda...our police don't shoot anyone x_x;; I mean they had to of course cos he could have pulled the trigger and blown everyone up but still...
Nice to see the police on top of things though i guess..
#75
Posted 23 July 2005 - 11:18 AM
Ravenblade, on Jul 22 2005, 03:17 PM, said:
I just heard that on the news. The news makes it seem like London is in real chaos right now, and it looks like police are everywhere ( there weren't that many when I went last summer)
#76
Posted 23 July 2005 - 06:42 PM
The police caught and killed one the terrorists on the day of their failed attempt. The terrorist attempted to run when the police saw him and he tripped and fell. The second he was on the ground civillian-dressed SAS (British Special Forces 'Special Air Services') shot the unarmed terrorist 5 times in the head while he was down to ensure the threat was 100% neutralised.
Pwned.
#77
Posted 23 July 2005 - 07:52 PM
#78
Posted 24 July 2005 - 05:55 AM
#79
Posted 24 July 2005 - 09:06 AM
#80
Posted 24 July 2005 - 12:20 PM
#81
Posted 24 July 2005 - 12:24 PM
Izar, on Jul 24 2005, 01:20 PM, said:
They barely let anyone bring anything onto planes these days. Last summer when I was going to London, this guy wasn't allowed on the plane because he threw a tantrum, because they didn't let him bring a certain bag on the plane. ( no lie) and this happened at Newark Airport ( where those planes sadly departed on Sept 11)
#82
Posted 24 July 2005 - 01:49 PM
#83
Posted 24 July 2005 - 02:11 PM
#84
Posted 24 July 2005 - 04:38 PM
#85
Posted 24 July 2005 - 07:09 PM
Golden Djinn13, on Jul 24 2005, 03:06 PM, said:
There are armed officers stationed at each train station, civillian-dressed SAS operatives crawling all over and Britains largest manhunt is going down, the police are gathering clues so rapidly it's shocking. They are bringing down a law that will give the police the freedom to search whoever they please whenever they please, no warrants or anything.
There are bombs being reported in every week, many of them are just mistakes though, people are paranoid now so everytime they see a bag they report it as a bomb.
#86
Posted 24 July 2005 - 07:14 PM
#87
Posted 24 July 2005 - 07:18 PM
#88
Posted 24 July 2005 - 07:30 PM
#89
Posted 24 July 2005 - 07:51 PM
#90
Posted 24 July 2005 - 10:43 PM
So what is the actual death toll in those london attacks? Last I heard, it was like 49 or something...
#91
Posted 25 July 2005 - 02:36 AM
We lost 66.666 times more people in 1 attack then you guys lost in 2. Consider yourselves very fortunate. =/ Harsh to say yes but atleast alot of countrys realize now that just because your not american doesnt mean you wont be attacked by what these people call "Terrorists" I prefer the term suicidal maniacs.
#92
Posted 25 July 2005 - 07:37 AM
Apparently the guy that the police shot dead was innocent. He didn't have a bomb on him or anything. I totally understand why they had to do it but it's a real tragedy. He shouldnt have run away ._.
#93
Posted 25 July 2005 - 09:16 AM
#94
Posted 25 July 2005 - 02:28 PM
pHantOm, on Jul 25 2005, 03:36 AM, said:
We lost 66.666 times more people in 1 attack then you guys lost in 2. Consider yourselves very fortunate. =/ Harsh to say yes but atleast alot of countrys realize now that just because your not american doesnt mean you wont be attacked by what these people call "Terrorists" I prefer the term suicidal maniacs.
How is that more?
The fatalities were in the thousands: 265 on the planes; 2,595, including 343 firemen and 60 New York City and Port Authority police officers, in the WTC; and 125 at the Pentagon. At least 2,985 people were killed in total. - Wikipedia.
#95
Posted 25 July 2005 - 03:54 PM
I never knew that many people died in the WTC, I thought it was around 1900 at the most. Its really sad that all those innocent people get killed for something, they had nothing to do with.
#96
Posted 25 July 2005 - 08:53 PM
Yeah. Terrorists are stupid. They think bombing countries is gunna scare people, but all it does is make them even more angry.
wow, found something on the chumhost site.
Quote
London Metropolitan police have a shoot-to-kill policy for suspected suicide bombers. They shot at the head because there is "no point in shooting at someone's chest because that's where the bomb is likely to be. There is no point in shooting anywhere else if they fall down and detonate it.
The man, Jean Charles de Menezes, was a Brazilian electrician who had been living in England legally for 3 years.
Interestingly, one witness described the man as being of Asian appearance and another said they saw him wearing a belt with wires strapped to it, highlighting the way people can jump to false conclusions.
The information was taken from the Sydney Morning Herald, 25 July, 2005.
#97
Posted 25 July 2005 - 09:45 PM
Ravenblade, on Jul 25 2005, 01:37 PM, said:
The government officially announced the Brazillian man who was shot 5 times in the back of the head while unarmed in public had nothing to do with the bombings. Oh well, that'l teach him to run when he hasn't done anything, I'd have shot him too if I told him to stop and he started running like a retard. Apaprently his family is suing the government.
#98
Posted 26 July 2005 - 04:39 PM
If he didn't had anything to hide he'd of just stay there.
When you run you seem guility and now is NOT time for any UK person to be kidding around, like the police.
#99
Posted 28 July 2005 - 06:26 AM
Worryingly though, a ot of people are now saying we should review Britain's stance on the human rights convention and stop letting asylum seekers into the country. Some are even suggesting that we deport all muslims. (we have hundreds of thousands of muslims here). It's really unfortunate that a few individuals are causing all this but i do understand people's reactions.
With that in mind though, we have dealt with far worse than Al Qaeda. The IRA killed about 3000 people in their stint of terrorism and they were actually funded by the US..so much for the war on terror business :) Anyways my point is that in the end we negotiated with them and things have settled down. Im aware that the goverments are saying that this is nothing to do with Iraq, but maybe if we did what they wanted and left the country alone they would stop focusing on us. If the US would stop policing the world, maybe they'd leave you guys alone too. I mean, they weren't always like this were they? We stuck our noses in and have had them bitten off.
#100
Posted 28 July 2005 - 10:01 AM
#101
Posted 28 July 2005 - 01:19 PM
#102
Posted 29 July 2005 - 01:46 PM
Ravenblade, on Jul 28 2005, 07:26 AM, said:
Well, there's your answer, heh.
Golden Djinni, I don't think that that would stop them. Even if we didn't own, they still hate other countries, religions, people, and all that.
#103
Posted 29 July 2005 - 05:50 PM
#104
Posted 29 July 2005 - 08:44 PM
Why will you want to take someone's life? Don't degrade yourself to their standards.
#105
Posted 30 July 2005 - 06:55 AM
The politicians obviously want to make it look like Iraq and Afghanistan had nothing to do with it (along with all the meddling we did before then - first gulf war *cough*) because that would mean they were wrong. We're now in this stupid situation because both sides are too proud to step back, even if it saves the lives of thousands. I mean realistically, what are we going to do? We can't stop them by force!! Therefore this will go on and on resulting in death after death until someone in the west finally says "no" and gives in.
#106
Posted 30 July 2005 - 09:42 AM
Eugine, on Jul 29 2005, 09:44 PM, said:
I was kidding, I would never lower myself to their standards.
To what RB is saying, I think it could happen. When they run out of oil it's all over, and I also agree that if we did leave them alone, that we wouldn't have any problems with them, but our leaders want to prove that they have the best army in the world, and they think if they defeat them, then they will gain a new territory.
#107
Posted 30 July 2005 - 10:14 AM
#108
Posted 31 July 2005 - 09:06 AM
Anyways, I think what we are doing is about all we can do. My cousins were over there, they at first were like others "pull out of the war" but now, they said the people over there need us bad.
#109
Posted 31 July 2005 - 12:22 PM
#110
Posted 01 August 2005 - 06:09 PM
Hearless people killing innocents? Well, If some one shoots at me, I hardly call that innocent.
#111
Posted 01 August 2005 - 06:47 PM
Anyway, I think that they are heartless, and this war is proving to be useless. We should discuss our issues. Thats what the freakin United Nations is for. :)
#112
Posted 01 August 2005 - 11:34 PM
On a sidenote: BASTARDS ISN'T A BAD WORD. Sheesh. Something like fuck is bad, so cover up the holes in that filter please.
#113
Posted 02 August 2005 - 08:24 AM
Can be bad. :)
Anyways, Bush got a new Ambassador for the UN, I forget who, but thanks to some few democrats(i'm not a democrat OR a republican OR a repo man :angry: ) he was able to bypass congress in doing so. I don't think he's going to be good, mainly because he looks strange.
#114
Posted 02 August 2005 - 12:39 PM
#115
Posted 02 August 2005 - 04:15 PM
#116
Posted 02 August 2005 - 05:24 PM
Andross, on Aug 2 2005, 12:34 AM, said:
UN and North america are both money grubbing save the Queens as you stated but back on track.
My co-workers where all scared when this happened because they figured that Canada would be the next target for any terrorist attack. Now I can see why they could be worried and I don't disagree that it can't happen but what can anyone gain from bombing Canada except maybe slowing down the trading business with other countries.
#117
Posted 02 August 2005 - 06:25 PM
#118
Posted 03 August 2005 - 01:42 PM
Andross, on Aug 2 2005, 05:15 PM, said:
Rice? Not really...
Canada isn't really a "next target" It's one of the few that may be targeted next, and it probably will due to the fact that canada has close relations to the US>
letsroll911.org - The people who made it hate bush completely and think everything he has done was a conspiracy or some other thing. Even his poll is biased. Both answers on "no" make whoever voted it sound dumb.
Quote
I mean what the heck?
#119
Posted 03 August 2005 - 02:30 PM
Like I said, everything thats happening to them is because of them so don't blame nothing but yourself.
Do you see that anytime someone does anything with the US they turn up regreting they did it?
#121
Posted 05 August 2005 - 12:45 AM
Izar, on Aug 3 2005, 02:42 PM, said:
Canada? No way. We're the big friendly country.
..That'll snap one day.
Kidding.
Seriously though, if we were attacked, we'd be screwed. I mean, we buy our submarines from other countrys garage sales..and then they sink.
Edmonton mall has more submarines than the canadian forces.
I do say, we'll be screwed.
#122
Posted 05 August 2005 - 12:47 AM
Piers diamondberg master, on Aug 4 2005, 11:45 PM, said:
..That'll snap one day.
Kidding.
Seriously though, if we were attacked, we'd be screwed. I mean, we buy our submarines from other countrys garage sales..and then they sink.
Edmonton mall has more submarines than the canadian forces.
I do say, we'll be screwed.
Amen to that. On that day, Canada will be split in two. People praying to god that a miracle happens, and the other half doing something about it.
#123
Posted 05 August 2005 - 01:19 PM
#124
Posted 05 August 2005 - 02:00 PM
#125
Posted 11 August 2005 - 02:10 PM
Wind Dude, on Jul 7 2005, 04:10 PM, said:
Bless you Winddude... :ph34r: My auntie and uncle live quite near where the bombings took place and even worst my friend's dad was caught up in the blast however he's fine and is back in Bristol.
Jeremiah, on Jul 7 2005, 09:22 PM, said:
Don't you worry it's highly unlikly that Iraq will be planning to bomb places like The Netherlands and France...
Mysterious Adept, on Jul 7 2005, 10:22 PM, said:
I have to say the USA is being very supportive of us and I thank you. At least though those dud bombs didn't hurt anyone and they've caught the perpatrators
Anubis, on Jul 7 2005, 11:24 PM, said:
Fight fire with fire, if they are attacking innocent civilians with hit and run tactics because they believe it is right. Then we can go send some pimped out stealth bombers to hit and run their countries because we believe that's also right.
It's just like a virus, you have to remove ALL of it. You can't just delete some of it and leave the rest, otherwise it will come back, and again, and again. If you kill a terrorist, a new one is trained, if you take out the training camp, a new one is made somewhere else, if you wipe out the faction, a new one is created soon after.
:blink: Never mind...
As Tony Blair said they did these bombings to worry us but we've learnt that nothing comes out of worrying. It's like what America learnt when September 11th struck, we need to carry on with our lives and although we cannot forget what tierney those twats caused us we cannot live in fear that the next day will be a day where we're going to be blown to bits by some bomb that was worn by an Iraqi suicide bomber...
#126
Posted 12 August 2005 - 11:02 AM
It will be hard for people to live a normal life, but like someone said in a previous post ( can't remember who, think it's Anubis though) living in fear is the worst thing possible.
#127
Posted 12 August 2005 - 11:36 AM
#128
Posted 12 August 2005 - 12:20 PM
#129
Posted 12 August 2005 - 12:57 PM
#130
Posted 12 August 2005 - 01:00 PM
#131
Posted 12 August 2005 - 01:06 PM
#132
Posted 16 August 2005 - 01:32 PM
#133
Posted 16 August 2005 - 05:46 PM
#135
Posted 17 August 2005 - 06:40 PM
#136
Posted 18 August 2005 - 06:14 PM
Everyone heard that Israel(Not Me!) Is moving outta the Gaza Strip... now who said that that fighting there would never end... ya ya, there still is fighting and some terrorism there...
#137
Posted 19 August 2005 - 09:52 AM
Golden Djinn13, on Aug 16 2005, 11:46 PM, said:
You have a very good point there. either way we can't change anyone's mind about these things...
#138
Posted 19 August 2005 - 03:34 PM
They threatened to hit us again sometime this week if we hadnt moved out of Iraq but that doesnt seem to have happened.
That guy they shot at the tube station though, it turns out that the police were really jumpy and that he wasnt doing anything suspicious. He had a thin coat on that couldnt possibly have hid explosoves and he didnt run - they dived on him and shot him about 17 times. I guess that's the effect terrorism has...
#139
Posted 24 August 2005 - 08:10 AM
#140
Posted 02 September 2005 - 10:31 AM
a few days after the bus bombing her sister called from london
she said that she was running to catch a bus but it left without her.
SO she got on the next bus. after she boarded she was watching the bus that just left. Sudenly that bus she had JUST missed exploded to think she was running so frantickly to catch a bus that was foing to explode. What a strrange twist of fate.
#141
Posted 03 September 2005 - 08:39 AM
But really, we already had laws to kick them out, or send them to jail to eat crappy food. Or death penalty if they get away with it.