Casamassina Plays Twilight Princess [Non-Spoiler]
#1
Posted 28 October 2006 - 07:28 AM
http://blogs.ign.com.../10/23/34660/p1
Discuss!
EDIT: Just to note that this topic is, and will hopefuly remain, spoiler-free. I ask anyone who posts in this topic not to tell us any spoilers. You have the TP thread for that.
#2
Posted 28 October 2006 - 02:53 PM
Still, should definitely be something to look forward to next week.
#3
Posted 28 October 2006 - 06:02 PM
#4
Posted 29 October 2006 - 02:32 AM
#5
Posted 29 October 2006 - 05:15 AM
And GL, Nintendo said not too long ago that the game is about 70 hours long, including all the side quests. Considering Casamassina will play as fast as he can in order to finish the game and he probably won't be doing any side quests, I believe he will finish it.
#7
Posted 06 November 2006 - 12:42 PM
http://www.planetgam...cfm?artid=12340
This is a spoiler-free impression, the only kind I read. They also have a spoiler-full preview. If you read it PLEASE DO NOT SAY ANY SPOILERS IN THIS TOPIC! I don't want to find out anything important story and also item-wise about the game before I play it.
#8
Posted 06 November 2006 - 07:48 PM
Matt talked with some guys and found out that the 100 hours isn't total bull: on average, the main quest takes 70 hours to complete, and that's with all these pro gamers who design games testing it out.
...woooooow. I cannot wait for this.
#9
Posted 07 November 2006 - 05:49 AM
This mailbag is a very interesting read. Once again, there are no spoilers:
http://www.planetgam...cfm?artid=12352
#10
Posted 07 November 2006 - 10:39 PM
And this game is going to kick alot of arse. It's got me hyped about the Wii again, I might actually buy one at launch like I originally planned O.o
Might have to preorder too if I want to actually get one, lol :>
#11
Posted 08 November 2006 - 12:12 PM
#12
Posted 08 November 2006 - 02:36 PM
#13
Posted 08 November 2006 - 05:32 PM
Don't get me wrong though, I'm enthusiastic to hear that they made such a deep Zelda!
As for a graphical point of view, all I'll say is that it looks fine. Not amazing, just fine. Buut... once you've played Oblivion, (possibly the best looking game released) you start to see other games with a more critical eye on pretty much every standard, so I'm probably just being picky. :)
#14
Posted 08 November 2006 - 08:26 PM
#15
Posted 08 November 2006 - 09:47 PM
#16
Posted 09 November 2006 - 12:38 PM
Anyhow, I really don't give a frickin' damn what the graphics look like. They're amazing for me, but they didn't even have to be so amazing and I would still be totally crazy about this game.
#17
Posted 09 November 2006 - 09:20 PM
http://wiimedia.ign.com/wii/image/article/744/744044/the-legend-of-zelda-twilight-princess-20061103051520539.jpg
http://wiimedia.ign.com/wii/image/article/744/744044/the-legend-of-zelda-twilight-princess-20061103051517992.jpg
http://wiimedia.ign.com/wii/image/article/744/744044/the-legend-of-zelda-twilight-princess-20061103051538632.jpg
#18
Posted 10 November 2006 - 05:39 AM
#19
Posted 10 November 2006 - 10:58 AM
BUT, looking at the last two pictures, is that high dynamic range (HDR) lighting I'm seeing? Yay, Nintendo is looking at the next generation of graphics for once! 8D
#20
Posted 10 November 2006 - 11:31 AM
#21
Posted 10 November 2006 - 04:53 PM
Zelda has good graphics now, yes. I'm just spoiled from looking at Oblivion. =P
#22
Posted 11 November 2006 - 05:13 AM
Wind Dude, on Nov 11 2006, 02:07 AM, said:
Yes, I would rather have a game that has awesome gameplay AND graphics, of course. I too like good graphics more than bad graphics. I'm just saying that good graphics does NOT mean the game is better, and the proof is that we all here play GBA games. If good graphics truly meant it was a better game, than we(and everyone else) wouldn't want to even look at the GBA.
#23
Posted 12 November 2006 - 08:29 PM