Sig, Avatar, And Set Rating Topic Rate other people's Sig/Avatar and Set!
#4201
Posted 21 April 2005 - 04:32 PM
#4202
Posted 21 April 2005 - 07:14 PM
I do not understand what is with the forks, but the advertisment banner is good. 4/5
#4203
Posted 21 April 2005 - 07:28 PM
#4204
Posted 21 April 2005 - 09:54 PM
#4205
Posted 22 April 2005 - 06:28 PM
Sig - Good too, but some people may take the bottom right part of the image a little offensively... :/ 7/10
Overall - 7.5/10
*New sig!*
#4206
Posted 22 April 2005 - 06:39 PM
All: I don't understand what the text means, but it's a great image. The text glow isn't bad either. 20/21
#4207
Posted 22 April 2005 - 07:19 PM
Izar: I like. =) 9/10
Tobias: No offense, but I don't really like it. >_> 4/10
Nobody: It's not a set. ^_^ 4/10
#4208
Posted 22 April 2005 - 07:48 PM
"Look at the shell that is you,
empty, fragile, weak,
soon the battle is ovver,
lost to apathy"
(Apathy: an absence of emotion or enthusiasm)
PDM: Your text on your avatar is whacked, but the overall image is nice, and the sig matches. The FEE banner looks out of place, but oh well.
7/10 for your set.
Izar: I ain't religious either, but I'll keep that out of the rating. I don't like the grey, I don't like the fact that you have 2 sizable images in your sig, and the quote on the first one is difficult to read (both fonts aren't that great). 3/10 for the set.
#4209
Posted 23 April 2005 - 01:16 PM
Avatar: A bit close-up, but I like it. 8/10
Sig: Like it too, and I like the background around the troop. 9/10
Set and Overall rating: It resembles a Republic Clone Trooper from Star Wars Episode II, and I'm a star wars fan myself. (9.5/10)
New set btw
#4210
Posted 23 April 2005 - 07:53 PM
Max height should be 200px.
Max width should be 500px.
The bg isn't that great, like I said in your art topic. The text is nice, but doesn't match. The only real plus to your set is that they match.
3/10
#4211
Posted 23 April 2005 - 08:15 PM
And if my avatar looks like part of my signature, go to the image URL and refresh; its not supposed to look like that.
#4212
Posted 23 April 2005 - 08:47 PM
And 450x200 still looks terrible.
Try 450x120px instead.
#4214
Posted 23 April 2005 - 09:42 PM
Avatar - Nice. 8/10
Sig - Nice also. 9/10
overall - 8.5/10
Excaliburs Power:
Avatar - Good also, dont get why theres a girl though. 8/10
Sig - Really good! If its not just me, I see 0's and 1's in there if I look carefully. 9/10
Overall - 8.5/10
And I have a new set....again!
#4215
Posted 23 April 2005 - 09:56 PM
Also, try it at 450x100px.
4/10 for this set.
#4217
Posted 23 April 2005 - 10:15 PM
Avatar:10/10
Sig:(Fork one) 10/10
#4218
Posted 23 April 2005 - 11:47 PM
#4219
Posted 24 April 2005 - 01:57 AM
Avatar is a bit too blocky since I think whoever made it for you stretched it.
Overal - 7/10
#4220
Posted 24 April 2005 - 02:00 AM
9/10 for the set
#4221
Posted 24 April 2005 - 02:20 AM
#4222
Posted 24 April 2005 - 08:37 AM
T3h sex.
Rating: 1-800-GETAROOM/10
Signature
T3h sexier. Gotta love the panty shot. ^_^
Rating: 9/10
Set
Goes together rather nicely.
Rating: 8.5/10
#4223
Posted 24 April 2005 - 07:10 PM
Remove the "watchitgo" or something.
Overall, 6/10 for the set.
#4224
Posted 25 April 2005 - 07:03 AM
Anyway, nice quote, but the image itself isn't very good :\.
6/10
#4225
Posted 25 April 2005 - 07:29 AM
I like your avatar Neon (WC3?). Signature is a little boring, and it doesn't match. So 5/10 overall.
#4226
Posted 25 April 2005 - 07:48 AM
Agatio: Nice. Kinda looks like shards of glass. And don;t go telling me that you already said that it looks like/ is shards of glass. You'll ruin the moment.
Anyway, It looks pretty cool, even though you just "threw it together"
Set: 8/10
#4230
Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:04 PM
#4231
Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:24 PM
Avvy--8/10
Siggy--8.5/10
Set--9.1/10
#4233
Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:37 PM
Gimli: Really basic stuff but points for effort I suppose, 6/10.
#4234
Posted 25 April 2005 - 04:49 PM
#4235
Posted 26 April 2005 - 10:49 AM
new sig =D... the Cogito one started to bore me. this one is less good, but at least it's different. and again, it was 80% experimenting, and 20% basics.
#4236
Posted 26 April 2005 - 01:02 PM
*does the new sig dance*
#4238
Posted 26 April 2005 - 04:39 PM
Agatio - Um... The city or whatever is in the background kinda stinks, the font works well with it though, 6/10
Gimli - The font = ugh... but the background looks neat and stuff. Clean and simple, I like it. 7/10
#4239
Posted 26 April 2005 - 04:52 PM
#4241
Posted 27 April 2005 - 03:51 AM
#4242
Posted 27 April 2005 - 07:51 AM
You can barely make him out though.
#4245
Posted 28 April 2005 - 11:36 AM
very simple, and I dont like the text. renders are nice but the bg doesnt look good. it needs a border too, and its too big. 6/10.
told ya not to fall :ph34r:
#4247
Posted 29 April 2005 - 03:10 PM
#4248
Posted 29 April 2005 - 06:35 PM
Av: 7/10
Sig: 8/10
Set: 8/10
Anubis: I'm not quite sure I'm comfortable with my parents around while that girl is wearing something that reveals her, uh... cheeks so much. XD;; But it's pretty cool looking, really.
Sig: 8/10
Av: 9/10
Set: 9/10
#4249
Posted 29 April 2005 - 10:02 PM
Wind dude
Avatar- Err....weird. No offence o.o 5/10
Sig- A little better, but weird too.... 6/10
Set- 5.5/10
#4250
Posted 29 April 2005 - 10:20 PM
I'd give WD's set a 4.
#4251
Posted 30 April 2005 - 12:36 AM
I dunno what to say, sorry. ><
#4252
Posted 30 April 2005 - 09:57 AM
Anyway, Im gonna be brutally honest and say that it is not very good. However, I reckon its 5x better than my first attempt at APS. Set: 5/10. You'll get better with practice
Have I already said that? meh.
Fire bender guy: Im gonna stick with the Paine one, becasue I dunno what the other one is based one.
Anyways; Yes, its pretty good, but the text is a little difficult to read (at first glance I didn't even see it) My opinion: Give it a 1px black stroke.
Paine sig: 7/10
#4253
Posted 30 April 2005 - 10:52 AM
its from avatar the last airbender hehe, and the second one is from final fantasy,
The text in the background, it is exactly what they say in the beginning of the show of avatar, you know the starting...but ya, i didnt mean it for people to read, but you can try :) .
#4255
Posted 30 April 2005 - 02:07 PM
#4256
Posted 30 April 2005 - 02:58 PM
Agatio, on Apr 29 2005, 10:20 PM, said:
I guess it's a difference in taste.
My sig got softened... And I put up a sig for Kids in the Way, one of my favorite bands.
Master Firebender: Um... don't really like the show all that much, but the sig is pretty good. 8/10
#4257
Posted 30 April 2005 - 06:33 PM
Avatar- 5/10 I just dont like it much
Sig- I dont like the first banner but the second one is good, especially with the star background (I am fascinated by Outer space :)) 7/10
Set- 6/10
#4258
Posted 30 April 2005 - 07:00 PM
Avatar: 2/10...that's all I have to say.
Signature banner1: Meh...it's alright. 4/10
Signature banner2: If you want to pass it off as an original creation, don't use a tutorial another member here made. :) 7/10
Gimli:
Set: Meepo..it needs work. 7/10
Mine:
Signature is messed, background is simliar to a tutorial I saw, but I made from scratchy. =) . >> 6/10
#4259
Posted 30 April 2005 - 09:07 PM
Why do people keep going over? It's just annoying for low bandwidth users, and it takes up more space than necessary.
#4260
Posted 30 April 2005 - 09:40 PM
#4261
Posted 30 April 2005 - 09:46 PM
Mines 450x125 or 130. Off by 5, woopty doo. :) The Kids in the Way banner not really advertising my own site.
PDM: Ok... That's a bit odd. Don't want a ferret sucking out my memories. 8/10 :D
#4262
Posted 30 April 2005 - 11:09 PM
Anyway, A nice set (Excluding the Kids in the way pic), but besdies that, its a nice matching and generally pretty cool. 8.9/10
#4263
Posted 30 April 2005 - 11:53 PM
Agatio, on Apr 30 2005, 10:07 PM, said:
Actually, I made it around the picture of the ferret and used the free transform to make it smaller, and any shorter than that, it would look squashed..unless I made it less wide, but that just won't do. >>
#4264
Posted 01 May 2005 - 12:10 AM
May as well rate our set:
Go back to your old set :) .
#4265
Posted 01 May 2005 - 01:01 AM
Agatio: The text doesn't work well aesthetically, IMO, mainly 'cause of that glow. Doesn't seem subtle enough. The bg is decent though, if not a bit harsh. 7/10.
#4266
Posted 01 May 2005 - 05:44 AM
Th Avatar is cool too. Very bright and bold.
Av: 8/10
Sig: 9/10
#4267
Posted 01 May 2005 - 07:24 AM
#4268
Posted 01 May 2005 - 07:31 AM
you siggy deserves a 8.7/10 with the text and all.
#4269
Posted 01 May 2005 - 07:53 AM
I like your siggy, nice border and brushes etc. did you make it?
Not a fan of all that text, oh well.
Avatar is mediocre (starcraft?)
7/10 overall for the set.
#4270
Posted 01 May 2005 - 01:10 PM
Agatio:
Avatar: Are those 3 pilars??? 6.3/10
Siggy: There are those pilars again... but they look like a city... Weird but good. 8.1/10
Set: They look good with each other, probarly cuz its thr same picture :) Well I give you a 7.5/10 for the whole set.
#4271
Posted 01 May 2005 - 01:58 PM
Sig: Blurry and hard to make out. 5/10
#4272
Posted 01 May 2005 - 02:07 PM
Wifflewood: Odd one there. The avatar's a bit strange. Sig's a bit boring. 7/10 overall.
DiddyKong: a 6/10 The images are kinda distorted, as in jagged edges.
#4273
Posted 01 May 2005 - 03:00 PM
4/10 overall.
#4274
Posted 01 May 2005 - 03:48 PM
#4275
Posted 01 May 2005 - 05:14 PM
I still suggest you go back, cut out the bg behind the people, use the smudge tool to get rid of rough edges and make things smooth/fade out more natural. Then it would be experimenting with the background and seeing what you get.
#4276
Posted 01 May 2005 - 07:52 PM
Andross: Top one is odd, can't tell what the right one is, 6/10. The bottom one I already rated. And the avatar is a bit out of place compared to your sig, but it's still the same rating.
#4277
Posted 01 May 2005 - 08:26 PM
In rating it, let me just say I agree 100% with Andross, and I'll give it a 4.
#4278
Posted 01 May 2005 - 09:00 PM
Izar, on May 2 2005, 01:52 AM, said:
The "stock" Doom 3 render I was working with didn't transfer well brightness/contrast wise. If you find a demon pic from Doom 3 that has better contrast, let me know. The game is so dark that it can be pretty hard to find a creature that actually has *gasp* lighting :P
#4279
Posted 02 May 2005 - 04:32 AM
Your avatar is ok. I like the effects. Other than that there isn't really much to it. 8/10. As for your signature, the text style is average but the effects are good. Nice pixel choice, and the banner is well established. 8/10.
Overall rating: 8/10. Nice.
#4280
Posted 02 May 2005 - 05:04 AM
But your avatar is uh... strange.
Set: 8.5/10
#4282
Posted 02 May 2005 - 07:52 AM
Your losing t3h plot d00d. lol. And the n00bs around here have gotten to me... Now Im speaking there language :wub:
Kidding, it looks great, especially with that faded out bit in the back ground. Can't slide nothin' by me when it comes to FF :P
9.9/10 - (-.1 becasue I don't even think you know who your using :wub: )
#4283
Posted 02 May 2005 - 01:29 PM
MR omg urs is so cool I cant believe my eyes O_O 100/10 :P
the person in my sig is from Vampire hunter D, so dont ask what he is from...please :wub:
#4284
Posted 02 May 2005 - 07:57 PM
Anyway, I'll give it a 7/10 (avatar and sig) because while the sig alone could get an 8 for being sorta cool, the avatar drags it down to a 7 for looking like a drawing from the 80's. It's just my opinion but I really hate that look.
#4285
Posted 02 May 2005 - 09:01 PM
#4286
Posted 03 May 2005 - 12:26 AM
http://img123.echo.cx/img123/2537/2ndsignature0mx.jpg
http://img123.echo.cx/img123/8135/signaturedwarf8iv.jpg
There's 2 more :P .
#4287
Posted 03 May 2005 - 03:54 AM
Shuyin is so badass :P. 10/10
Rouge (WTF is his name???) Is one of my favoured classes on Dark Alliance, plus since it looks cool, I'll give it 8/10. Its VERY plain....
meh, but you intended it that way, correct?
#4289
Posted 03 May 2005 - 11:15 PM
Random quote...
Now how did I get so popularrrrrrr?
People cross da street watching me with binocularrrrrs!
#4290
Posted 04 May 2005 - 05:49 AM
Please note:
I don't like anime.
I don't watch anime.
I'm not an anime fan.
I don't know who these characters are.
#4291
Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:07 AM
Anyway, they all look pretty good I guess. This aint coming from an Anime fan though: Get Illidan :P
Anubis: Is that font Sumdumgai? I love that name.
Some-dumb-guy. *laughs*
Anyway, it looks similar.
Set: (The red one): 9/10. Nothings perfect, though, that comes close.
#4292
Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:12 AM
MR: It's ok. The avatar is good, but the quality could be better.
Signature is boring, not a text only fan I'm afraid.
4/10 overall.
#4293
Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:34 AM
the reason why you see a non-cool non-pic sig, is becasue yours truely cannot come up with a new one. So I've been making crappy little phrases for the time being.
New sig Agatio? Background effect is nice, but the foreground charcter is... not you :P
#4294
Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:38 AM
#4295
Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:43 AM
I've only had one sig ever made for me and dammit, it's gonna stay that way :P
*sigh* I'll make a new one...
*wonders off*
#4296
Posted 04 May 2005 - 07:44 AM
Memories Remain, on May 4 2005, 01:07 PM, said:
Anyway, they all look pretty good I guess. This aint coming from an Anime fan though: Get Illidan :P
Anubis: Is that font Sumdumgai? I love that name.
Some-dumb-guy. *laughs*
Anyway, it looks similar.
Set: (The red one): 9/10. Nothings perfect, though, that comes close.
Nah it's Furious Ming from a Jade Empire. It's an awesome XBOX role playing game, anyone who has the brick should go and buy it.
#4297
Posted 05 May 2005 - 06:24 AM
Anubis -- Bg and render are very good.. but the text really ruins it. its to thin, and the color and blending options really makes it out of line with the sig. 8/10, if u change the text, 9/10
#4298
Posted 05 May 2005 - 08:10 AM
Anubis, on May 4 2005, 09:44 PM, said:
Why by one of those black things whe I have a PS2? Which is in fact ALSO black :P
Neo: Cool dude, but you've had it for ages correct?
Set: 9/10
#4300
Posted 07 May 2005 - 10:29 AM
Agatio, on May 1 2005, 08:26 PM, said:
Quite trying to get away with being rude, it's annoying, and you have no right to tell me to grow up. I wasn't complaining about Andross's post, I was just saying my signature is the way I like it.
Black Mage: Sig is a bit plain, but FF1 blackmages did own! 6/10
#4301
Posted 07 May 2005 - 12:32 PM
New siggy, this time the style is way different, again its experimenting.
#4302
Posted 07 May 2005 - 03:31 PM
#4303
Posted 08 May 2005 - 12:04 AM
The little animations below it is funny. XD I would give it an 8/10 in all. o.O
#4304
Posted 08 May 2005 - 12:17 AM
Linear, on May 7 2005, 10:04 PM, said:
The little animations below it is funny. XD I would give it an 8/10 in all. o.O
Well Lin, it wasn't cut off, I made it that way. Thank you, I liek the animations too and it's supposed to be sad...it's...RAVEN...the goth of the teen titans. The reason for this set if because I took a quiz to see what Teen Titans character I woudl be, and it said Raven. So...here is my set.
Well, Lin, you're sig and avie are OKAY...like the avie NO I DID NOT TAKE IT how can u accuse me of that >>''' nice...kinda...nevermind...hard to explain. 7.6/10 =/
And actually, I didn't add the extra space. I made it smaller. so HA!!!! DOUBLE HAAAA!!!!!!!!! u.uV
#4306
Posted 08 May 2005 - 01:07 AM
#4307
Posted 08 May 2005 - 01:15 AM
Words are depressing...but...i understand why...
#4308
Posted 08 May 2005 - 01:16 AM
#4309
Posted 08 May 2005 - 01:20 AM
#4310
Posted 08 May 2005 - 02:07 AM
#4311
Posted 08 May 2005 - 02:13 AM
@Gimli: It is the Space! It looks kinda flashy too. x.x; The effects on it are good, and somehow both the avatar and the sig seems to be really into the space zone (Don't ask what I mean XD My secret) 6.9/10
#4312
Posted 08 May 2005 - 03:01 AM
9/10
#4313
Posted 08 May 2005 - 04:27 PM
#4315
Posted 09 May 2005 - 04:20 PM
Gimli: 1, get better at photoshop.
EP: Good concept, but you didn't excecute it quite well enough. Colours clash and text looks bad. 5/10 for set.
#4316
Posted 10 May 2005 - 06:15 AM
Agatio: Cool. A definite symbol of APS skills.
GtG: Why have "forum(s)" if you know there is more that one? Just have "Other cool forums", k? Set; 7/10/ Your getting better I guess ;)
Wiflewood: I've always been a fan of ligtning bolts, even though I've never used'em. 8/10
Yuki: Granted, you used MS paint (correct?), so something mind-blowing isn't expected. I guess it's okay. I little plain, and I don't really want to read it, so: 7/10.
EP: Nice as always. Your incredibly skilled in my opinion. 9/10
#4317
Posted 11 May 2005 - 05:35 PM
#4318
Posted 11 May 2005 - 06:26 PM
Same goes for sig. 9/10
Set is 9/10 (for the set, I just average the ratings of the Sig and avatar if anyone wants to know)
#4319
Posted 12 May 2005 - 01:16 PM
#4320
Posted 12 May 2005 - 03:57 PM
#4321
Posted 12 May 2005 - 04:08 PM
#4322
Posted 12 May 2005 - 05:30 PM
#4323
Posted 13 May 2005 - 12:30 PM
#4324
Posted 13 May 2005 - 09:35 PM
#4325
Posted 14 May 2005 - 12:19 PM
I just wanted to try something simple, and yes, its a basic brush set. hm... Im actually way to lazy to start designing now, so you'll have to do it with this :)
#4326
Posted 14 May 2005 - 06:39 PM
ED: I think I already rated yours, but I think it's a bit unorganized. 5/10 I like Sonic though!
Woocha, new set dude.
#4328
Posted 14 May 2005 - 09:31 PM
#4329
Posted 14 May 2005 - 09:58 PM
#4331
Posted 14 May 2005 - 10:15 PM
Your sig is just, crap. Image is poor quality and oversize, and the quote is very not funny. Avatar looks stretched and also low quality, plus it doesn't match.
Overall 2/10 for the set.
#4332
Posted 14 May 2005 - 10:20 PM
agatio, ill give you a 4/10 for yours
and yes, i realize mine isnt that great, ill change it later, but im too lazy to do it right this second
and 8-bit theatre isnt supposed to be "great quality", its just supposed to be funny :P
#4333
Posted 14 May 2005 - 10:27 PM
#4335
Posted 14 May 2005 - 10:41 PM
Anyways, Like I said, or was gunna say, get Paint Shop pro, or better yet, photoshop.
#4336
Posted 15 May 2005 - 01:04 AM
maybe someone besides agatio rate me this time
#4337
Posted 15 May 2005 - 01:22 AM
6/10 for this set, it's a little better.
#4339
Posted 15 May 2005 - 10:30 AM
The DogWho: Bad quality, but I guess it can be a bit funny, depending on the situation. 5/10
#4340
Posted 15 May 2005 - 05:11 PM
#4341
Posted 15 May 2005 - 06:09 PM
Black Mage: 6/10 The avatar could be a little bit more clearer.
#4342
Posted 15 May 2005 - 11:20 PM
Quote
No, I'm not, if you don't like getting critical ratings then stop posting in this topic.
ED: Signature image is nice, but the text below puts me off it. Maybe removing the sprite and making both lines of text the same colour would improve it/ Avatar is distorted, blurry, and doesn't match, that brings your set down. 4/10.
#4343
Posted 16 May 2005 - 12:06 AM
10/10
Only critique is with the avvie, its just a block, and doesn't really give you a face, and its a bit of an odd image for an avatar if you get what I'm talking about.
8/10
#4344
Posted 16 May 2005 - 12:40 AM
9/10
Avatar could use a little more work since it is so similar to the banner. :P
#4345
Posted 16 May 2005 - 03:52 AM
#4346
Posted 16 May 2005 - 07:22 AM
#4347
Posted 16 May 2005 - 07:46 AM
Filter > Blur > Gaussian Blur > 7.0 > Edit > Fade Gausian Blur > Mode = Darken > 100%
Love the new siggy Neo. Good colours, and nice blending.
#4348
Posted 16 May 2005 - 09:34 AM
9/10
#4349
Posted 16 May 2005 - 10:27 AM
I'll never figure out how to do that...I'm no good at brushing. :P
...
And I sure as hell have no idea of how to work with layer masks.
#4350
Posted 16 May 2005 - 10:31 AM
I added a little Get firefox thing to my sig. (I finally have it!)
#4351
Posted 16 May 2005 - 11:05 AM
#4353
Posted 16 May 2005 - 03:52 PM
#4354
Posted 18 May 2005 - 04:07 AM
#4355
Posted 19 May 2005 - 10:14 AM
8/10
#4356
Posted 19 May 2005 - 10:01 PM
#4357
Posted 20 May 2005 - 03:53 PM
#4358
Posted 20 May 2005 - 09:44 PM
Anubis: The background is pretty bland, the the blending of the character is non-existant. Text is boring, the only saving grace is that they match. 5/10 for set.
#4359
Posted 21 May 2005 - 09:45 AM
Agatio: Have no clue what it is for, but it's actually pretty good. 8/10 because the avatar is too plain.
Anubis: It's bad... I like the Splinter Cell one best. Text is good though, I give it a 7/10. Bad quote too.
Neo: Hmmm, the color and all is great, but the face is wierd... 8/10 because the blueish eyes next to the face rock.
#4360
Posted 21 May 2005 - 09:51 AM
Izar: Avatar gets a 4. The scanlines are too visible, the colours aren't that great, this ruins the actual image. A black border would have been better, and maybe lower saturation. Signature image 1 gets a 2. Again with the scanlines,and that text is near impossible to read. Signature image 2 gets a 2, it's is very bland, text again hard to read, and bg very plain. Quotes are unneeded, and why the light blue? Think about the people using the mercury skin. Overall I give your set a 4 (added the numbers and halfed it).
#4361
Posted 21 May 2005 - 09:54 AM
#4362
Posted 21 May 2005 - 10:36 AM
#4363
Posted 21 May 2005 - 11:02 AM
Gimli: I think I already rated yours, but... I dunno. 6/10 because t's very plain and average. But the background is neat.
#4364
Posted 23 May 2005 - 12:32 AM
#4365
Posted 23 May 2005 - 01:30 PM
#4366
Posted 23 May 2005 - 04:04 PM
Mathak: Your signature is too tall. Kinda humerous, but still too tall, I'd leave it at the top image and 1 line of text tops. Avatar very amatuear, overall a 4/10 for the set.
#4368
Posted 24 May 2005 - 11:10 AM
Tobias, yours looks kinda swell. I'll give it a 8.5/10 for now. I'm generous.
#4369
Posted 24 May 2005 - 04:39 PM
#4370
Posted 24 May 2005 - 04:49 PM
Sig - Comepletly crappy words. -10/10
Avatar - What is it? All it is, is a piece of paper with like, shadowy effects. 4/10, but the image was done well, I'll give you that.
l3lueMage:
Sig - Nice, the effects rule. 9/10 because it's just a bit plain.
Mathak Kraven:
Sig - Nice image, and the Hammertime is hilarius, cuz it reminds me of the Mad TV episode making fun of him. 9/10
#4371
Posted 24 May 2005 - 05:14 PM
Nice render in your sig bluemage, but the colour is a miss.
#4372
Posted 24 May 2005 - 05:18 PM
#4373
Posted 24 May 2005 - 05:24 PM
Quote
Silhouette of a crow against what looks to be a piece of paper with writing on it, also spots of blood can be seen too.
#4374
Posted 24 May 2005 - 05:26 PM
Ok, now that I know what it is, I think I can manage. :rolleyes:
#4375
Posted 24 May 2005 - 05:44 PM
http://img261.echo.cx/img261/4539/bluesig3vw.jpg
http://img261.echo.cx/img261/402/yellowsig4rl.jpg
#4376
Posted 24 May 2005 - 05:54 PM
#4377
Posted 24 May 2005 - 05:57 PM
#4378
Posted 25 May 2005 - 10:58 AM
Bluemage : 9.5/10
#4379
Posted 25 May 2005 - 01:43 PM
New Set!
#4380
Posted 25 May 2005 - 02:00 PM
l3lueMage, on May 24 2005, 05:57 PM, said:
Yeah, I don't know what went wrong in the first one, It looked perfect in Paint Shop Pro, Oh well, I guess all I can do is work harder. Thanks.
#4382
Posted 26 May 2005 - 03:15 AM
Many thanks for reviving that wonderful memory Tobias, 10/10 for emotional attatchments :P
#4383
Posted 26 May 2005 - 03:30 AM
#4384
Posted 26 May 2005 - 02:14 PM
Sig: At least that makes sense. 5/10
#4385
Posted 26 May 2005 - 02:55 PM
5/10 for the avatar, blink. It's really bad quality.
#4386
Posted 26 May 2005 - 04:10 PM
#4387
Posted 26 May 2005 - 11:12 PM
Looks great Anubis -- 9/10
Agatio -- strange avatar, but I do like it. 8/10
#4388
Posted 27 May 2005 - 03:23 AM
I've always gone for simple sigs personally, I like things that look plain yet complex.
#4389
Posted 27 May 2005 - 04:49 PM
Ever notice that when it touches the top, it bounces imediately, but when it bounces from the bottom, it take longer? :P I just noticed it.
I got a new one, It's a metal band called Norma Jean. My Favorite metal band.
I don't think there is much to rate. Any one got any new ones I haven't seen? :)
#4390
Posted 27 May 2005 - 06:14 PM
Izar, on May 27 2005, 03:49 PM, said:
Hey yeah, i just noticed that too :lol:
Heres my new set for now. Im experimenting with different sets to see what goes best, so you might see me change it around once in a while
Izar - 6.5/10
#4391
Posted 27 May 2005 - 08:20 PM
Nice one, the image is small though, BM, maybe a larger banner is needed. 7.5/10
EDIT: Also, I made a funny little image on my sig. :P
#4392
Posted 27 May 2005 - 10:56 PM
#4393
Posted 27 May 2005 - 11:02 PM
The image it's self is a CD cover image, and so is my avatar. I did VERY little editing to either one (just added a border to the avatar)
#4394
Posted 27 May 2005 - 11:06 PM
Quote
Mozilla Firefox*
And I hope you're not implying E is in any way better :P .
#4395
Posted 27 May 2005 - 11:11 PM
Ha, no, That's the point of the Image. IE and Mozilla can never be in the same league. Mozilla Owns IE. period. End of Story. The End. Cut. Ok, you get the picture.
I'm gunna do the same with Firefox and Netscape, just not now.
Why is everyone into dark signatures all the time? Oh well, At least I stand out. :P
#4396
Posted 28 May 2005 - 12:00 AM
Ill give you +1 points for that. 7.5/10
Oh yeah, and i changed the quote in my sig :P
#4397
Posted 28 May 2005 - 12:02 AM
#4398
Posted 28 May 2005 - 12:13 AM
Avatar looks like crap, very "un-avatarish" as you would say. Also doesnt match sig, which is a bunch of words. How boring
1/10
#4399
Posted 28 May 2005 - 12:17 AM
Very immature. I gave you honest feedback and ways in which you could improve, you gave bias tripe just to annoy me, well done.