Wii Discussion
#803
Posted 07 June 2008 - 01:15 AM
It's doomed to fail. XD
#804
Posted 07 June 2008 - 01:20 AM
Surely if you have room to use a Wiimote, you have room for that?
#807
Posted 07 June 2008 - 01:35 AM
It's doomed to fail. XD
#808
Posted 07 June 2008 - 03:40 AM
#809
Posted 07 June 2008 - 07:56 AM
i was expecting Nintendo to release the Wiiboard seperate so you could have another pointless gimmick to spend £20+ on, and of course it's only compatable with like 5 games
#810
Posted 07 June 2008 - 08:17 AM
Then again all add-ons are like that, even the good ones. I mean, Guitar Hero may be popular, but that guitar is useless for any other games.
#811
Posted 07 June 2008 - 08:39 AM
#812
Posted 07 June 2008 - 08:51 AM
#813
Posted 07 June 2008 - 08:56 AM
i'm sure nintendo will try and cash in, releasing some stupid wiimote instruments or something
#816
Posted 07 June 2008 - 10:41 AM
Sorry, had to bring it up.
#817
Posted 07 June 2008 - 10:44 AM
#822
Posted 07 June 2008 - 03:24 PM
Caael, on Jun 6 2008, 06:27 PM, said:
Now what does that tell you?
It's not the console, it's the lack of support for it. At least, the kind of support that gamers (who are the ones buying the stuff in the gaming industry to begin with) would like to see.
No real RPG's, no decent real racing games (Pro Street was a dissapointment), and it's only starting to get some FPS's. Though we won't know whether they're good or not until they come out.
The DS/GBA/PSP(mainly PSP) have the RPG's, the 360 has the FPS's and racing games, and the PS3 has some RPG's and some racing games. The Wii has adventure games and crap titles.
#824
Posted 08 June 2008 - 05:15 PM
Caael, on Jun 6 2008, 06:27 PM, said:
Now what does that tell you?
Well, I'm still a major fan of Nintendo, which is still far and away better than Microsoft and Sony, in m y opinion. After all, like I said before, Nintendo is where all my favorite games are from.
Still, it's just that the Wii won't show much of its potential if all it's producing is games like Spongebob Squarepants or something...
#825
Posted 08 June 2008 - 05:17 PM
Quote
Talk to the 3rd Party developers that are making shovelware *coughubisoftcough* :(
#826
Posted 09 June 2008 - 11:29 PM
Current controllers:
Wavebird: Joystick eternally moves up/ Buttons work at random.
Orange: Half of the buttons are impossible to press.
Silver: 1 second delay.
#827
Posted 10 June 2008 - 01:54 AM
#829
Posted 10 June 2008 - 04:05 PM
watch, on Jun 10 2008, 03:54 AM, said:
Seconded. I find the Wiimote configuration actually very nice, smooth, and easy to pick up. My only complaint with it is that the D-pad is too short in any direction, so unintentionally I'll jump when I mean to go right during really hectic moments. But I've overcome that now, and I quite like it.
#830
Posted 10 June 2008 - 06:48 PM
I'm still having controller issues like Nos, except now the controller eternally goes down which is bad for obvious reasons... shielding... I recommend Wiimote + Nunchuck, it's actually really good if you give it a chance.
#831
Posted 12 June 2008 - 05:19 AM
Anyway, I got my Wavebird for $45. Why did you pay twice as much, Nos?
#832
Posted 28 June 2008 - 01:23 PM
http://www.wiiwii.tv/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/zeldawii.jpg
#837
Posted 01 July 2008 - 03:07 PM
All the other games are just so dam kiddy and mario-raped that it's annoying. Sure some games are fun to play with friends like Brawl, but that's only for an hour or two tops. After that, I'm not picking up the game for at least 3 days. Super Mario Galaxy, is fun, for 15 minutes, because each level is so the same. I can't stand the bright kiddy colours anymore. I want dark, realistic enviroments, not bright coloured with inflated heads people. Mario strikers, the uberphailure for any game that calls itself a soccer game. It just sucks, because it's not football, it's way too easy to score, even on hard.
It's all more of the same, in every mario game, each and every level, and it's so basic and easy.
Trauma center and FE are still good fun though.
... Trauma center is good fun though.
#841
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:48 AM
Aquamarine, on Jul 2 2008, 02:40 PM, said:
srsly
It suffers with what was wrong with Castlevania: Portrait of Ruin.
The levels arent the same, but there's different tilesets for levels, like the bee one, the ice one, the toy one; which are all reused over and over again. They're different levels, but look the same so it's incredibly boring to play them again and again.
#842
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:50 AM
#843
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:54 AM
#844
Posted 02 July 2008 - 06:23 PM
#845
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:12 PM
#846
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:33 PM
#848
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:37 PM
Oops Wii talk.
Okami is the last game I'll probably buy for a while. =/
#849
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:39 PM
And allright, Okami. Good game, but honestly better on the PS2. Shit, even Nintendo Power said to play the PS2 version for a better experience, and they work for Nintendo.
#850
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:40 PM
#852
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:43 PM
http://www.google.ca/search?hl=en&q=ni...eview&meta=
You'll find it somewhere in there. I'm not lying though.
#853
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:44 PM
#854
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:47 PM
#855
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:51 PM
http://en.wikipedia....%8Ckami#Reviews
That's a very odd thing to do, I've never heard of official magazines mentioning rival consoles in actual articles before, only ads.
#856
Posted 02 July 2008 - 07:54 PM
#857
Posted 03 July 2008 - 02:06 AM
to give something like Okami 7.5/10 is fair enough i suppose, i mean they can't score it too highly or it might show up Zelda, but to do like that and then to give Mario Kart 9/10 is ****ing retarded.
Okami Wii also sold poorly, congratulations general gaming public, you're all terminally retarded
#859
Posted 03 July 2008 - 03:45 AM
I thuroughly enjoyed the game, even staying up 'till midnight or 1 AM (back then I was usually in bed asleep by then) playing it. I'd give it a 10/10 if it held my interest for longer, but it didn't. I got bored of it relatively quickly (within about two months). Therefor I'd give it an 8.5 or 9 out of 10.
#862
Posted 03 July 2008 - 01:33 PM
#863
Posted 03 July 2008 - 02:23 PM
#864
Posted 03 July 2008 - 02:32 PM
#865
Posted 03 July 2008 - 03:19 PM
...no seriously, even with four players this game doesn't seem to be that entertaining.
#866
Posted 03 July 2008 - 05:15 PM
And GL, it's all an opinion. It almost doesn't matter what spect of the game it is. Some people wll find it inovative, and some people will see it as repetitive.
#868
Posted 03 July 2008 - 05:47 PM
#871
Posted 03 July 2008 - 06:24 PM
#872
Posted 03 July 2008 - 06:28 PM
#873
Posted 04 July 2008 - 03:33 AM
its not remotely decent and nobody buys it any more
#874
Posted 04 July 2008 - 06:24 AM
Anyhow, I've only played 1 and 3 and enjoyed both of them. I can't wait for an online MP for Wii, I'm definitely getting that.
#877
Posted 04 July 2008 - 08:08 AM
Aquamarine, on Jul 4 2008, 02:24 PM, said:
Anyhow, I've only played 1 and 3 and enjoyed both of them. I can't wait for an online MP for Wii, I'm definitely getting that.
MP 8 doesn't have an online function?
*runs downstairs and checks*
#878
Posted 04 July 2008 - 09:14 AM
#879
Posted 04 July 2008 - 09:19 AM
Aquamarine, on Jul 4 2008, 01:24 PM, said:
Nintendo are the only company allowed to get away with this kind of ****, as long as you retards keep lapping it up, they're not going to change anything.
It amuses that Nintendo are often praised for the originality where there are
this many Mario games
14 Zelda games
10 Metroid games
with all the titles in each series of each the 2D era using the same basic formula and the same is true for the 3d era
#882
Posted 04 July 2008 - 09:30 AM
but yeah, echoes and corruption were awful, awful games.
#883
Posted 04 July 2008 - 09:35 AM
Laharl, on Jul 4 2008, 04:22 PM, said:
Super Metroid
Metroid Fusion
Metroid Prime 1
are good
**** YEAH!
But no I have to disagree with you on the Zelda part, I mean the boomerang in Twilight princess had a slight wind effect! While the boomerangs in the other games did not have a slight wind effect, how can you say they are the same!?
#887
Posted 04 July 2008 - 09:45 AM
#888
Posted 04 July 2008 - 09:47 AM
#891
Posted 04 July 2008 - 09:52 AM
Echoes was just awful. It should not have been made.
#892
Posted 04 July 2008 - 09:53 AM
#895
Posted 04 July 2008 - 10:43 AM
Laharl, on Jul 4 2008, 04:51 PM, said:
http://www.thefreakshowradio.com/sitebuilder/images/AVGN_LOGO_collage-484x241.jpg
I enjoyed the first Prime, it pulled me in enough to complete it, despite not having played any other Metroid game. The only problem was the amount of backtracking.
I've seen some gameplay for the new Wario game on Wii. It looks fun, like the old Wario Land games on GBA.
#897
Posted 04 July 2008 - 11:22 AM
Laharl, on Jul 4 2008, 05:19 PM, said:
It amuses that Nintendo are often praised for the originality where there are
this many Mario games
14 Zelda games
10 Metroid games
with all the titles in each series of each the 2D era using the same basic formula and the same is true for the 3d era
Okay, so I missed the word 'purchase' in that post you quoted, big deal!
I want to make one thing completely clear though: I've never bought even one Mario Party in my life. I rented it and played it on Emulators, but I never even dreamed of spending big money on it.
And why is everyone bashing Echoes all of a sudden?! That was one amazing game, one of the best I've ever played, and I personally enjoyed it way more than Prime 1, though looking at it realistically Prime 1 was a better game. And Caael, I thought you hadn't played Echoes? Did you play it in the meantime or are you just basing your opinion on a review?
I'm yet to play Corruption though, and I'm looking forward to it.
#898
Posted 04 July 2008 - 05:29 PM
The opening menu music was awesome though.
#899
Posted 04 July 2008 - 06:52 PM
Please, try to tell me that Halo 3 isn't exactly the same as Halo 1, but with a few more guns.
I understand that Nintendo is stale, it needs a fresh original series to make it more appealing, don't forget the good series it has though. Nintendo's survived this long for a reason. Fanboys aside.
#900
Posted 04 July 2008 - 10:02 PM
Majora's Mask was quite different. It felt more like you were actually living in a real world with lots of side quests. Different things are happening every day. Plus, you had the ability to transform into 3 different characters. The Wind Waker was also somewhat of twist albeit for the worst. The only one that really has any backing to be called the same thing was Twilight Princess, but you know what? It was still good.
#901
Posted 05 July 2008 - 12:33 AM
I've been playing Zelda since Link's Awakening on the original Gameboy. And I've played everyone since then, and you know what? They've all been fun and worth it.
#902
Posted 05 July 2008 - 01:35 AM
#903
Posted 05 July 2008 - 03:23 AM
It may be unorigional, but I found Wind Waker fun, so yeah. :P
Dipset, on Jul 3 2008, 04:50 PM, said:
BOTH OF THOSE FORKING SUCKED.
Seriously. I was unbelieveably dissapointed. MP4 was better than those two. M5 and later were/are horrible.
The origional beats all. Period.
#906
Posted 05 July 2008 - 12:22 PM
watch, on Jul 4 2008, 08:52 PM, said:
Please, try to tell me that Halo 3 isn't exactly the same as Halo 1, but with a few more guns.
I understand that Nintendo is stale, it needs a fresh original series to make it more appealing, don't forget the good series it has though. Nintendo's survived this long for a reason. Fanboys aside.
watch, on Jul 5 2008, 02:33 AM, said:
I've been playing Zelda since Link's Awakening on the original Gameboy. And I've played everyone since then, and you know what? They've all been fun and worth it.
Well said, quoted for truth.
#907
Posted 05 July 2008 - 12:59 PM
Need moar termina.
#908
Posted 05 July 2008 - 01:08 PM
But as for the other Zelda games they do need the change I mean for **** sake all the games play out in the exact same way! "Get 3 orbs, get master sword, get 4 or 5 of these other things, go ganons tower, impale him in the face with your sword (This one however can change)"
I am a big fan of the Zelda series, but it does need to change, Twilight princess was no where near as good as the other for me because by the time I played Twilight princess the game itself just didnt feel as fun as the previous games in the series (Considering I had played all the console ones).
Mario however does change a lot between games and all I want from Mario is for them to not rehash levels and make the game longer than Galaxy.
On that note while I complted NSMB in a day I have spent over 80 hours on that game.
#909
Posted 05 July 2008 - 01:11 PM
#910
Posted 05 July 2008 - 01:15 PM
#911
Posted 05 July 2008 - 03:34 PM
#912
Posted 05 July 2008 - 06:02 PM
*sits back and waits for huge fallout and criticism*
#913
Posted 05 July 2008 - 06:11 PM
I thought Wind Waker was great. I never got what other people's problem with it was.
#914
Posted 05 July 2008 - 06:13 PM
#915
Posted 05 July 2008 - 06:26 PM
#916
Posted 05 July 2008 - 06:41 PM
Laharl, on Jul 5 2008, 05:13 PM, said:
How? If you take those things out you're left with the dungeons, which were so short and easy they seemed almost designed to teach kindergarteners lateral thinking, rather than challenging a Zelda fan like me.
Unless you're talking about side quests, which I didn't bother to find because sailing was so boring.
#917
Posted 05 July 2008 - 06:52 PM
Nosferatu, on Jul 5 2008, 08:11 PM, said:
I thought Wind Waker was great. I never got what other people's problem with it was.
Laharl, on Jul 5 2008, 08:13 PM, said:
Legolastom, on Jul 5 2008, 08:26 PM, said:
Ahh! That's wonderful music to my ears.
WD, it sounds to me you're judging Wind Waker as a "Zelda" title and defining it by "Zelda" standard only, instead of judging it on its own.
There's more to it than that. It's about the game's atmosphere and presentation. It all came together remarkably well in Wind Waker. Whereas Twilight Princess' storyline always seemed to just be in the "background" and not really drive the game forward, Wind Waker actually presented a compelling tale that it made you feel a part of... tell me how it felt when you realized that
#918
Posted 05 July 2008 - 06:53 PM
#919
Posted 05 July 2008 - 07:01 PM
It's not a bad game, but on that Zelda standard I was disappointed.
#922
Posted 06 July 2008 - 12:13 AM
Wind Dude, on Jul 5 2008, 09:01 PM, said:
It's not a bad game, but on that Zelda standard I was disappointed.
Well, of course. The Zelda standard is something TP succeeds at better than WW. More dungeons. More items. More free-flowing exploration. More quests. A longer title.
However, immersion is a different story. I see that it didn't happen with you in WW, perhaps those elements are what you look for in a Zelda title. For me personally, a lot of TP felt fragmented - the wolf mechanic is never fully explored or even explained (just that Link can't keep his normal form in the Twilight Realm). Later on, when you can use it freely, it seems to become more filler than anything, just to transport around faster. The storyline itself, beyond Midna (who was quite an amusing character) was woefully lacking... I never felt an urgency as to why I had to save Zelda. Granted, this might be true of other Zelda titles, but all there was in TP was this gold-diamond forcefield around the castle in the background as a reminder.
WW, on the other hand, had sailing as its premise. However arduous it might have been at times (though I, like Legolastom, actually quite enjoyed it), it was the premise of the story and the game's theme, not a seemingly random sidetrack to the main game (as the whole wolf gameplay was for TP). There was more life in WW. It was so vibrant a world, by comparison TP felt a bit dull and even gloomy at times. The cel-shaded graphics were simply breathtaking and really added a certain quality to the characters, it fit remarkably well with the motif, like a watercolor painting come to life. And the plot was simply beautiful, especially the way it linked itself with Ocarina of Time. I know I've mentioned this before, but the
So that's my input on it. It's a personal thing to be sure, but I honestly believe WW was so inspired, and so underappreciated a concept. I'd love to hear your response.
#923
Posted 06 July 2008 - 12:28 AM
I'm not sure what you're expecting me to say when I've already made my point. Twilight Princesses gameplay was simply superior in my eyes, that makes it a better game. Though you're right, the scene with Hyrule Castle was probably the high point of Wind Waker for me. After that it sort of went downhill.
#924
Posted 06 July 2008 - 04:19 AM
Sure, WW had a better story. But the way the story is presented, and the atmosphere of the entire game was so much better in TP. The characters are far more interesting and have way more personality than in WW. That point was actually in Nintendo's advertising campaign for WW, yet they failed so miserably in that aspect, but got it right in TP.
Then there's the fact that TP's a much larger game, with more dungeons and more items. Not to mention the fact that the dungeons were much more interesting in TP. The dungeons in WW pretty much sucked, while TP had some truly excellent ones, dungeons that could almost be compared to OOT's ones. Just remember Snowpeak Ruins, City in the Sky and my favourite, Arbiter's Grounds. Next, the items were much more original. Most of them in WW were taken directly from Ocarina, whilst TP had many completely new , and many old ones with slightly new abilities.
Of course, TP was also more difficult. WW is perhaps the easiest game I've ever played. TP however actually had me thinking how to get through some of the dungeons, searching aimlessly through them. Not mention that the graphics were definitely better in TP...
But screw this, Majora's Mask is the best Zelda ever, and I doubt they'll ever manage to make a better one.
#925
Posted 06 July 2008 - 12:03 PM
So basically, I agree with what Aqua said. TP's story presentation was better than TWW's. I found the world a lot more immersive too. Might be able to attribute that to Wii controls, though.
#927
Posted 06 July 2008 - 01:55 PM
#928
Posted 06 July 2008 - 02:59 PM
#929
Posted 06 July 2008 - 03:13 PM
Majoras Mask was just oh so awesome. Is it out on VC in Europe yet, because if it is, i'm buying it straight away. Everything about that game was awesome; the surreal setting of Termina, the dark plot, the foreboding music. It was definately much darker than other Zelda's, and the mask system was awesome. I would honestly be ecstatic if the next Zelda game was a remake of Marjoras Mask. The NPCs were full of character, and there was loads of back-story to them, and hundreds of sidequests. I loved the surreal setting; Ikana Canyon is probably the best location in any game ever created. I cannot express my love for Majoras Mask in words, however I feel an orgasm would fit quite well.
#930
Posted 06 July 2008 - 03:26 PM
#931
Posted 06 July 2008 - 03:38 PM
#933
Posted 06 July 2008 - 04:05 PM
#943
Posted 08 July 2008 - 11:54 AM
Seriously, the mario games just become one blur after an hour.
#944
Posted 08 July 2008 - 03:49 PM
#945
Posted 09 July 2008 - 06:15 AM
RE4 actually made me jump a few times. Can't say many games have made me do that. Maybe AVP2 when I was younger. Frickin Aliens.
#946
Posted 24 September 2008 - 06:05 AM
Nintendo are once again overreacting Piracy that really isnt damaging their business all that much
#947
Posted 24 September 2008 - 07:34 AM
#948
Posted 24 September 2008 - 01:42 PM
I actually haven't started up my Wii in a little while. When's the update comming out?
#949
Posted 25 September 2008 - 06:03 AM
#951
Posted 26 September 2008 - 09:06 AM
#953
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:19 PM
Yes? Thought so...
Am I the only one who thinks that Wario shaking stuff looks very, very dirty?
No? Thought so.
#954
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:21 PM
Wha-? I mean, uh, so yeah, the Wii... It is phailing.
#955
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:30 PM
And even Smash I've come to realize lacks the depth of gameplay Melee has.
... yes, it took me this long to realize, but I've finally succumbed.
#956
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:36 PM
#957
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:37 PM
Aquamarine, on Sep 26 2008, 03:36 PM, said:
Metroid Prime 3: Yes.
Brawl: Most likely not.
#958
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:40 PM
Nosferatu, on Sep 27 2008, 12:37 AM, said:
Brawl: Most likely not.
Wow, I was really expecting you to say that neither game would. That's what I said to myself when I saw you viewing this topic. It's good that you guys aren't so predictable. Laharl would probably say that though...
And yes, this post has nothing to do with anything. Ignore it.
#959
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:47 PM
Aquamarine, on Sep 26 2008, 03:40 PM, said:
And yes, this post has nothing to do with anything. Ignore it.
Un-ignored.
Also I'm a Metroid fan. I have every Metroid game in existance. Plus it was a damn good game.
#960
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:51 PM
#961
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:56 PM
Aquamarine, on Sep 26 2008, 03:51 PM, said:
I think you're thinking about Prime 2. Personally I would say Prime 1 > Prime 3 > Prime 2. Although it was still a good game.
Same with Return of Samus. Not as good, but still good.
#962
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:56 PM
#963
Posted 26 September 2008 - 04:58 PM
Nosferatu, on Sep 26 2008, 03:56 PM, said:
Same with Return of Samus. Not as good, but still good.
I rented Corruption for the fatass's Wii a while ago. It was my first Metriniod game.
#964
Posted 26 September 2008 - 05:01 PM
Miley Cyrus, on Sep 27 2008, 12:58 AM, said:
... wut/
Nosferatu, on Sep 27 2008, 12:56 AM, said:
Same with Return of Samus. Not as good, but still good.
Ah, I see. Well, I'm in complete disagreement with you about Prime and Echoes. I honestly didn't enjoy Prime much for some inexplicable reason, yet Echoes is simply one of THE best games I've ever played.
But hey, it's all a matter of opinion.
#965
Posted 27 September 2008 - 07:04 AM
#966
Posted 27 September 2008 - 09:12 AM
And then came Echoes, which I definitely enjoyed more than any other single player GameCube game and was completely hooked to. I know, it's strange.
#967
Posted 27 September 2008 - 09:34 AM
One of the best parts of the game IMO was when you were at the very furthest point on your map in the Ice place and it just felt so secluded and peaceful there.
#969
Posted 27 September 2008 - 09:54 AM
It's fun in the "lol look what randomly happened!", not in the "wow, I actually pulled off that combo".
#970
Posted 27 September 2008 - 10:29 AM
Golden Legacy, on Sep 27 2008, 05:54 PM, said:
Oh God, I hate that about Mario Kart. MK is one of the most over-rated game series ever.
Legolastom, on Sep 27 2008, 05:34 PM, said:
One of the best parts of the game IMO was when you were at the very furthest point on your map in the Ice place and it just felt so secluded and peaceful there.
It's not the difficulty, I never stop playing a game because it's hard. Not to mention that I didn't find Prime to be overly difficult even once, whereas Echoes was often a ****ing nightmare. I had to fight that Boost Guradian guy about ten times before I beat him. Then again, I absolutely ADORED the difficulty of Echoes, and I kept replaying that Boost Guardian battle without switching off the console until I defeated him, because it was such fun. I just couldn't put the controller down.
And you're talking about Thardus, who I believe I defeated on my second try. Omega Pirate was way harder...
Anyhow, I usually enjoy difficult games more than I enjoy easy ones.
#971
Posted 27 September 2008 - 12:33 PM
But Mario Kart, I used to play MK DS years ago with my mates at school everyday, about 6-8 of us playing, while individual races could vary a lot it became pretty clear who the best players were (I was 2nd or third best in the group). But it’s surprising how frequently someone will get a Blue shell when your about to win.
#972
Posted 27 September 2008 - 12:40 PM
#973
Posted 27 September 2008 - 01:30 PM
So... Super Mario RPG. Anyone here played that? I'm wondering whether I should get it for VirtualConsole when I get the chance. I've been reading only praises, but I'm not sure if it would still be good in this day and age, whether it's "dated" now.
#974
Posted 27 September 2008 - 04:10 PM
#975
Posted 27 September 2008 - 05:27 PM
Metroid Prime: On hard, I'd say the hardest boss was the Omega Pirate. Eas enough though. Also, everybody whined and *****ed about how they couldn't beat Meta-Ridley on hard. I didn't even lose an energy tank.
Prime 2: Not so much hard as annoying. That ****ing under-water boss in the lower part of Torvus (I haven't played 2 in a while so I hope that's right.)
Prime 3: The boss in the seed on Bryyo. Only hard because of lack of energy tanks. Some how I won in one go by some miracle. I had 5 energy for a really long time. Also Dark Samus. What a *****.
#976
Posted 29 September 2008 - 06:04 AM
Come on, there was no way I was going to let that pass by.
#978
Posted 02 October 2008 - 12:02 PM
Final Fantasy: Crystal Chronicles announced for both DS and Wii. Mario & Luigi 3 for DS. Endless Ocean 2 and Pikmin 1 remake for Wii.
Yes, that's it. NO ZELDA OR KID ICARUS FOR YOU!!
EDIT: **** yeah, another DK Jungle Beat has been announced for Wii!
Btw, that was sarcasm.
#979
Posted 02 October 2008 - 12:13 PM
Aquamarine, on Oct 2 2008, 11:02 AM, said:
Final Fantasy: Crystal Chronicles announced for both DS and Wii. Mario & Luigi 3 for DS. Endless Ocean 2 and Pikmin 1 remake for Wii.
Yes, that's it. NO ZELDA OR KID ICARUS FOR YOU!!
EDIT: **** yeah, another DK Jungle Beat has been announced for Wii!
Btw, that was sarcasm.
Mario & Luigi 3? **** yeah. The first two were amazing.
#980
Posted 02 October 2008 - 12:18 PM
Anyhow, a new Punch-Out for Wii is also being shown, as well as a rhythm game and Sin and Punishment. Oh, and Trace Memory 2. Here: http://www.nintendow...cfm?artid=16833
#982
Posted 02 October 2008 - 05:15 PM
Also, Mario & Luigi 3. I actually wasn't too happy with M&L2. Loved the first. But M&L2 took out the overworld from M&L1 and I just didn't like it as much as the first. The charm kind of died out.
#983
Posted 03 October 2008 - 08:37 AM
Ninty can suck my balls.
#984
Posted 03 October 2008 - 08:44 AM
Aquamarine, on Oct 3 2008, 03:37 PM, said:
Ninty can suck my balls.
what the ****
no, really. What the ****.
Nintendo deserve to burn because they're so ****.
So what, you can wave your arms about. Who cares anymore?
#985
Posted 03 October 2008 - 08:56 AM
fucking pathetic
i'd be ashamed to be a Wii owner
#986
Posted 04 October 2008 - 08:27 AM
And I have a prediction to make: Nintendo won't be making another Metroid, a new Pikmin, StarFox or F-Zero for Wii. Am I right or am I right?
#987
Posted 04 October 2008 - 08:36 AM
Aquamarine, on Oct 4 2008, 03:27 PM, said:
And I have a prediction to make: Nintendo won't be making another Metroid, a new Pikmin, StarFox or F-Zero for Wii. Am I right or am I right?
does anybody even care anymore?
nintendo have probably given up on continuing any franchises, with the exceptions of mario and possibly zelda because anybody with sense has probably got a ps3 or 360 by now and sold their wii to an autistic child
#988
Posted 04 October 2008 - 08:39 AM
F-Zero and Starfox are far too difficult for the average Wii owner, and who needs new Pikmin and Metroid when we have two whole remakes of each to look foward to?
#989
Posted 04 October 2008 - 10:45 AM
But yes, this is a ridiculously cheap tactic and way to cash in. Ah well... Tales of Symphonia 2?
#990
Posted 04 October 2008 - 04:07 PM
Golden Legacy, on Oct 4 2008, 06:45 PM, said:
What about it? It's not like they mentioned it or anything.
All the even partially good games were third party. Madworld, the Conduit, CoD, Dead Rising, possibly FF:CC even. Perhaps the only worthwhile Nintendo game was Sin and Punishment, though I'm not holding out too much hope for it.
The DS had some decent stuff though. Mario and Luigi, Fire Emblem, Chrono Trigger...
Overall, the only Wii game that actually interested me isn't even a game at all. Endless Ocean 2 is the only title I'll be keeping my eyes open for.
But in the end, I am in full agreement with Caael... Ah well, it was a nice run. Nintendo has given me many good games throughout the past 10 or so years. I was planning on making the Wii my last console anyway. Just gotta play through a couple of remaining titles and that will be it. Plus, let's not forget, I have a perfectly working DS emulator, so I'll definitely be enjoying Mario and Luigi 3 and Fire Emblem DS in the future.
This conference is like a kind of warning to me, letting me know that a big part of my life will be over before I expected. I guess I'll just have to make the most of what I'm still to play, because I'm sure as hell not getting a 360 or PS3.
#991
Posted 04 October 2008 - 05:52 PM
Aquamarine, on Oct 4 2008, 07:27 AM, said:
And I have a prediction to make: Nintendo won't be making another Metroid, a new Pikmin, StarFox or F-Zero for Wii. Am I right or am I right?
**** off Nintendo. Make new games.
Why don't the remake Metroid II for the Gameboy? I mean, they re-did the first Metroid, and Super Metroid doesn't need to be re-done. Metroid II retards. Do it.
#992
Posted 04 October 2008 - 10:41 PM
Aquamarine, on Oct 4 2008, 03:07 PM, said:
All the even partially good games were third party. Madworld, the Conduit, CoD, Dead Rising, possibly FF:CC even. Perhaps the only worthwhile Nintendo game was Sin and Punishment, though I'm not holding out too much hope for it.
The DS had some decent stuff though. Mario and Luigi, Fire Emblem, Chrono Trigger...
Overall, the only Wii game that actually interested me isn't even a game at all. Endless Ocean 2 is the only title I'll be keeping my eyes open for.
But in the end, I am in full agreement with Caael... Ah well, it was a nice run. Nintendo has given me many good games throughout the past 10 or so years. I was planning on making the Wii my last console anyway. Just gotta play through a couple of remaining titles and that will be it. Plus, let's not forget, I have a perfectly working DS emulator, so I'll definitely be enjoying Mario and Luigi 3 and Fire Emblem DS in the future.
This conference is like a kind of warning to me, letting me know that a big part of my life will be over before I expected. I guess I'll just have to make the most of what I'm still to play, because I'm sure as hell not getting a 360 or PS3.
Get a PS2 if you don't have one. Cheap, still being supported, and has a crapload of good games to play.
That's what I'm doing anyway. I might ask for a 360 next christmas though. Or buy it myself if I get a job.
#993
Posted 05 October 2008 - 11:41 AM
Aquamarine, on Oct 4 2008, 03:27 PM, said:
And I have a prediction to make: Nintendo won't be making another Metroid, a new Pikmin, StarFox or F-Zero for Wii. Am I right or am I right?
I've been away for a few days so I didn't know about this. Can't the Wii support Gamecube games anyway? Surely people could buy a cheap gamecube copy and play that instead?
#995
Posted 08 October 2008 - 12:22 AM
Download capability is in for Gamecube games apparently. Was on IGN's site, but I can't remember the article.
~1500
#996
Posted 12 June 2009 - 01:40 AM
I really like playing both guitar hero and rock band, but I've only ever played them for xbox 360. I have a Wii, and I'm wondering which game is better for the Wii. I want to get the whole set up (I'm surprisingly talented at the drums D:) so I don't want to invest in one that's going to suck. Also, what about the music choices for each? I want more modern rock music if possible.
#997
Posted 12 June 2009 - 02:01 AM
I prefer Rock Band's visuals to Guitar Hero. I also like the equipment that comes with Rock Band. My Guitar Hero's guitar seem to be over-responsive and I can't even strum up and down without the game reading an extra strum.
As for the tracks, you might want to research what comes with the game, as well as downloadable tracks.
Rock Band 1 Tracks
Rock Band 2 Tracks
Rock Band Downloadable Tracks
Guitar Hero 3 Tracks
Guitar Hero: World Tour Tracks
FD28
#998
Posted 01 September 2009 - 07:23 PM
GUYS THE INTERNET CHANNEL IS NOW FREE.
AND ANYONE WHO PAYED FOR IT GETS A FREE NES GAME.
#1000
Posted 01 September 2009 - 11:26 PM